No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. – Article II, Section 1, Clause 5
It was obvious to many Americans that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro could NOT be constitutionally eligible to even RUN for president well before Hillary stepped aside during the 2008 Democratic convention. For Hillary supporters the end of their affiliation with the democratic party happened on May 31st, 2008 when the corruption of the party was in full view as Clinton delegates were given to Obama in states where he wasn’t even on the ballot. It was obvious then that the powers that be had decided who was going to be the nominee and it did not matter who the people had voted for. That is when the digging on Barry really started and the fake COLB was produced. TPTB tried to deflect the attention to Obama/Soetoro being born in Hawaii but the true issue was his ineligibility because of his british citizenship at birth from his father’s side and his indonesian citizenship from his step-father. (more…)
Yesterday was the Monster’s 2nd birthday, and as you may have noticed, I haven’t published any current events in a few days. Unfortunately for me, the research I have been doing has shifted my paradigm irrevocably, and my largest concern right now is whether or not the RedLemur and I have enough time to get the research done and write a series of articles that lays out the web in such a way as to be easily understandable.
That being said, this writer needs to take a break from posting about current events on a daily basis. For two years, I have written and tried to wake up as many people as I can to what the MSM and their globalist masters have hidden from you. Now my time needs to be spent researching almost exclusively instead of telling you about the latest insanity from the revolutionaries in the White House and the monied chess players in the shadows. We now have plenty of alternative media ranging from Drudge, BigGovernment, InfoWars, and Gateway Pundit to smaller blogs chasing the insane “reform” bills in Congress. I really need to devote my time to the noose hiding in plain sight that is tightening around our necks.
Glenn Beck spoke earlier in the week about connecting the data points to see the bigger picture. That is exactly what is happening right now, and because of the scope and time frame of the elitists’ plan, I cannot spend my time telling you about the indonesian/kenyan in the WH golfing while the oil leak is still gushing. Believe it or not, unless Barack Obama is doing something involving the United Nations or Sweden, his actions are no longer relevant in the paradigm I now have to live in. Oh, to put this genie back in the bottle…
I will continue to put up Beck shows that I feel are relevant; say what you want about Beck, he actually has some damn fine research being fed to him, and he does hit some of the data points from time to time. He probably knows about quite a few of the rest but just does not want to believe it.
I will also post Judge Napolitano’s FreedomWatch for as long as they allow it to be on the air because more people need to start thinking like Constitutionalists that value American sovereignty, individual rights, and property rights so that you will understand the level of serfdom/slavery we are already subject to.
I do not know when I will start publishing the ‘noose’ articles, so I recommend that you subscribe by email as you will be notified of any new articles. I want to thank all my loyal readers and my sponsors for standing beside the Monster on the path that we have been traveling. I will be sending you emails soon.
For fellow researchers out in the ether, if you want to send me links on Monsanto and Rand, please feel free to hit the Contact Page at the top of the blog.
In closing, I would like to state that the entire leadership structure has been corrupted. You are more than aware that we can no longer trust the White House, the Congress, Military Brass, the Supreme Court or any of the egghead ‘think tanks’ being funded by both sides. Trust your instincts, work toward making your state’s sovereignty the most important issue your individual candidates focus on, and holler, scream, petition your state legislatures to work toward getting the United Nations out of our country and our lives. When this pResident tries to sign an executive order approving one of their treaties or this Congress votes to sign a United Nations treaty,MARCH ON WASHINGTON!
That is the beginning and the end of the conversation.
AYFKM? Given this rational, I should be a shoe-in for the chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs because I have worked for former military, or maybe the President and Leader of the Free World because I have been following politics for decades and have actually read the Constitution.
I’m not saying this lawyer isn’t talented, but she absolutely does not have the PROPER credentials to be appointed to the highest COURT in the land as a JUSTICE for the rest of her life. AYFKM? (On a completely related note, you might want to check out Snark’s best today; Mullah Omar Captured, Named to Supreme Court)
President Barack Obama’s nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court gives Republicans little ammunition in an election year.
While providing a tempting opportunity to rally conservative voters and raise money ahead of the midterm elections, seven Republicans, including Senate GOP Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.), voted to confirm Kagan as solicitor general just last year.
Many Republicans also are philosophically opposed to filibustering judicial nominees. (more…)
Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold received an earful at a recent townhall meeting. Mr. Feingold isn’t sure that the Supreme Court will approve the mandated insurance as Constitutional, but he thinks they will. Has anyone told Russ how far the Supreme Court has gone to break the contract with America?
They’re Back!!! The other branch of government that has broken the contract with America. This year should be interesting considering the cases about campaign finance and the Second Amendment, and a justice about to turn 90 and showing signs of retirement.
After a holiday break, the Supreme Court returned to work Friday with unfinished business at hand, some of its toughest cases ahead and a looming decision that could rock the national political landscape in this year of midterm congressional elections.
But it is an old case that is puzzling court observers and consuming the political world: a pending decision on whether restrictions on corporate and labor union spending on political campaigns violate the First Amendment. It arose from a less significant question about whether a conservative group’s financing of and distribution plans for a documentary — “Hillary: The Movie,” a scathing account of Hillary Rodham Clinton‘s presidential pursuit — violated the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
The court heard oral arguments on the original question in March 2009, but adjourned in June without a decision. Instead, the justices said they would consider the larger question of whether it is constitutional to ban corporations and labor unions from drawing funds from their general treasuries to support or oppose candidates.
Let’s take that shot at the Second Amendment now, shall we?
The new year will bring at least a few new cases to a docket that is mostly full — the court traditionally stops hearing oral arguments in April. The court has already taken at least one case that will command the nation’s attention: whether the Second Amendment right to personal ownership of firearms that rendered unconstitutional the handgun ban in the federal enclave of Washington also applies to state and city attempts to severely restrict gun ownership.
And all will be watching Justice John Paul Stevens for additional signs that he plans to retire and give President Obama a second opportunity to nominate a justice. Stevens will celebrate his 90th birthday in April, and he has prompted the speculation by hiring only one clerk for the term that begins in October. Retired justices have one clerk; active justices hire four.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will decide whether the right to own guns for self-defense, announced by the court last year when it struck down the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns, also covers states and other cities with gun-control laws.
The landmark decision in Heller v. District of Columbia did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond the federal government and federal enclaves like the District.
The case the court accepted Wednesday concerns the city of Chicago, which bans most handguns.
In the Heller case, the court held for the first time that individuals have a right to gun ownership. Until then, the court had only recognized that the constitutional “right to keep and bear arms” protected a state’s ability to maintain a militia.
Other court precedents have held that the Second Amendment restricts only federal law, as was the case with most of the Bill of Rights. Through the years, the court has applied most of the amendments, but not all, to the states, a process called “incorporation.” The Heller decision specifically left the question about the Second Amendment for another day.
Alan Gura, the Alexandria lawyer who successfully challenged the District’s law, sued the city of Chicago, which has a handgun ban virtually identical to Washington’s, plus other restrictions. Ruling in that case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit said only the Supreme Court can decide whether the Second Amendment applies.
“Even if the Court were to hold the Second Amendment applicable to states and localities,” he said, “such a ruling is unlikely to change the crucial holding by the Supreme Court in Heller that a wide range of reasonable gun laws are presumptively constitutional, and that the Second Amendment right is narrowly limited to guns in the home for self-defense.”
The door is about to be opened to the loss of more states and individuals’ rights.
As you all know, I’m still down the rabbit hole at the moment, but I ran across something in my late night round up that may interest those of you that have a moment to wander the internet and see what you come up with…my spidey sense went off a bit when I read this. I recognized the name of the law firm, and those readers that are regulars will know why immediately. That would be fact #1, #2 is Justice Souter’s retirement was announced today, and #3 is that people of power and means just keep mysteriously committing suicide. I suggest whatever is found is sent to me in an email, and I will distribute it to the group.
A 59-year-old lawyer with an Atlanta-based firm who was about to lose his job because of the economy was found dead in his Washington office yesterday of an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to police.
Mark I. Levy, a Bethesda resident who was a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Clinton administration, was discovered by a co-worker about 8 a.m. in his 11th-floor office at Kilpatrick Stockton, in the 600 block of 14th Street NW, police said. They said evidence indicates that Levy shot himself in the head with a .38-caliber handgun.
The firm would not comment on his death beyond issuing a statement calling him a “highly respected” colleague and offering condolences to his family.
Kilpatrick Stockton, which employs scores of people in offices in the United States, Europe and the United Arab Emirates, announced Tuesday that 24 lawyers would be laid off.
Based on detectives’ interviews, police learned that Levy had been told he was among those being let go, according to a law enforcement official familiar with the case. Kilpatrick Stockton’s Web site says Levy was head of the firm’s Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Practice. He argued 16 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court during his career, it says.
Another source familiar with the case, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is not complete, said that yesterday would have been Levy’s last day at work and that he was given four months of severance pay.
Diane Prucino, a co-managing partner of the century-old firm in Atlanta, confirmed the layoffs Tuesday in a statement quoted by the Fulton County Daily Report.
The source said Levy left a note in his home saying he loved his family and instructing his wife on how to handle finances and other matters. He apparently had spent some time recently getting his affairs in order, the source said.
The source said Levy’s 20-year-old son found the note yesterday morning and called Montgomery County police.
An officer was at the home when someone called from the law firm. The officer spoke with the caller, learned of the suicide and then told the family, according to the source.
Computer records show that Levy swiped his entrance card to get into the building at 607 14th St. from a parking garage about 5:30 a.m., the source said, adding that Levy was the registered owner of the handgun.
According to his biography on the firm’s Web site, Levy was a Yale Law School graduate who joined the Justice Department in 1993 as deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Division, overseeing 60 lawyers handling appellate litigation.
Go here for the law firm bio for Mr. Levy; I will leave everything else unsaid.
Has anybody heard anymore about Kellerman lately? (That’s rhetorical, by the way.)
WASHINGTON – Justice David Souter is planning to retire after nearly two decades on the Supreme Court, giving President Barack Obama his first chance to fill a vacancy on the high court.
The White House has been told that Souter will retire in June, when the court finishes its work for the summer, a source familiar with his plans said Thursday night. He almost certainly would remain on the bench until a successor is confirmed.
The source spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak for Souter.
Souter had no comment Thursday night, a Supreme Court spokeswoman said.
Souter’s retirement is unlikely to alter the ideological balance on the closely divided court because Obama is certain to replace the liberal-leaning justice with someone with similar views.
But the vacancy could lead to another woman on the bench to join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, currently the court’s only woman.
At 69, Souter is much younger than either Ginsburg, 76, or Justice John Paul Stevens, 89, the other two liberal justices whose names have been mentioned as possible retirees. Yet those justices have given no indication they intend to retire soon and Ginsburg said she plans to serve into her 80s despite her recent surgery for pancreatic cancer.
Interest groups immediately began gearing up for what could be a grueling battle over a high court vacancy.
“We’re looking for President Obama to choose an eminently qualified candidate who is committed to the core constitutional values, who is committed to justice for all and not just a few,” said Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice.
Some of the names that have been circulating include recently confirmed Solicitor GeneralElena Kagan; U.S. Appeals Court Judges Sonya Sotomayor, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Sandra Lea Lynch and Diane Pamela Wood; and Leah Ward Sears, chief justice of the Georgia Supreme Court. Men who have been mentioned as potential nominees include Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Harvard Law professorCass Sunstein and U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo of Chicago.
Souter earned his bachelor’s and law degrees from Harvard sandwiched around a stay at Oxford University as a Rhodes scholar.
Could it be this simple? Could this all wash out like Capone being nailed for tax evasion instead of murder? After all the twists and turns in regards to lawsuits in several different states and at the U.S. Supreme Court, you would think that at some point the story about B. Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be president would either be completely swept under the rug by the million dollar lawyers Bambi has retained, or it would break wide open. I think we just caught a break, or possibly two:
Dr. Orly Taitz of DefendOurFreedoms informed the Beaumont, Texas Police Department of suspected illegal and criminal activity by Bambi. I am putting up her letter and the response she received, and then we’ll move on to the FBI.
I am an attorney representing over 130 members of the US military, 10 state representatives, ambassador Keyes and other citizens, questioning legitimacy of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro for presidency. Among them are following citizens of the State of Texas:
LTC Chetwin Hurd
SGNT Morgan Samuel Ward
Capt. Ralph H. Jenkins
SGNT Jeffrey Wayne Rosner
LCDR Jeff Graham Winthrope
Mr. Richard D. Sanders
Mrs. Jody Brockhausen
While doing research of this case, I’ve uncovered a number of instances of suspected illegal and criminal activity by Mr. Obama and his supporters. As an officer of the court I have a solemn duty to report such activity to the law enforcement and demand immediate investigation, subpoena of the records and prosecution to the full extend of the law.
Mr. Obama has availed himself to the jurisdiction of the state of Texas as he put his name as a candidate for president on the ballot here and additionally he came and campaigned here.
Please see attached reports, that should help in your investigation.
Reports contain a computerized image of Certification of life birth for Mr. Obama and Certification of Selective Service and statements from experts, showing those documents to exhibit numerous signs of forgery.
It is my understanding that in the State of Texas forgery is a class C felony that carries up to 10 years in the state penitentiary. On two counts of forgery Mr. Obama might be facing up to 20 years in jail in the state of Texas alone, since those counts run consecutively. Since Mr. Obama has availed himself to the jurisdiction of 50 states with similar statutes, he might be facing 1,000 years in state penitentiaries around the country on forgery charges alone. Additionally, there are numerous counts of suspected fraud, voter fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, corruption of a public official, intimidation, interference with the system of justice, social security fraud, tax fraud, perjury and other related crimes. As the National Security is at stake, I would request your immediate attention to this matter and expedient report with a report number of the suspected criminal activity and subpoena of Mr. Obama’s vital records, such as his original vault long version birth certificate in Hawaii, passports from Indonesia and Kenya, immigration records, certification of selective service, school registration from Occidental College, Harvard university and Columbia University.
I am attaching a 164 page dossier of suspected illegal activity. You can find more documents for download on my blog DefendOurFreedomS.us
electronic signature Dr. Orly Taitz Esq
26302 La Paz ste 211 Mission Viejo Ca 92691
29839 S. Margarita Pkwy Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
ph. w 949-586-8110 c-949-683-5411 fax 949-586-2082
I have received your email and I will use it to further my investigation into the Criminal matter concerning Barack Hussein Obama. The only thing that I will be able to file on is crimes committed in the City of Beaumont Tx.. However, with your information, I will attempt to add to the criminal charges or bring it to the attention of someone who can go further. I am a very resourseful individual and I guarantee that I will fight to the end. I do not enter into this matter lightly or with blind abandon. I do this because I too took an oath as a Police Officer to defend the Constitution of not only the great state of Texas but also the great nation of the United States of America. [Redacted] Again, thank you for the information and I will be back in touch with you very very soon. [Redacted] There is another Officer who works in C.I.D. (Criminal Investigation Division) who would be more than willing to join me in pursuing this investigation. I have as yet to tap this resource.
If you have any more questions, or you obtain any more information that you think would be beneficial to my case, please feel free to contact me anytime of the day or night.
Officer Ronald C. Dischler Sr.
Beaumont Police Dept.
Beaumont Tx., 77701
You have to give Dr. Taitz credit for being a pitbull with lipstick and not letting this go.
Now for the FBI and another investigation (see investigating Wall Street) that will probably never reach the light of day since “we are cowards” Eric Holder is in charge:
‘305 million Americans need to know if foreign national is usurping presidency’
ACalifornia attorney battling on a number of fronts to obtain documentation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president is asking the FBI and U.S. Secret Service to investigate suspected “tampering” at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Orly Taitz, who is pursuing nearly half a dozen causes through her Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, says the issue of Obama’s eligibility to meet the Constitution’s demand for a “natural born” president has been before the Supreme Court at least four times.
But she wonders whether the justices actually were given the pleadings to review.
“I believe … that there was tampering with documentsand records by employees of the Supreme Court and the justices never saw those briefs,” she alleges in a letter to the FBI’s Robert Mueller, the Secret Service’s Mark Sullivan and Attorney General Eric Holder.
“Three hundred five million American citizens … need to know whether a foreign national is usurping the position of the president and the commander in chief,” she wrote.
Taitz raises questions about “forgery of court records, tampering with court records, cyber crime, erasing of court records from the docket, fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud and other related crimes.”
Specifically, she points to the handling of her own case, Lightfoot v. Bowen, which was submitted to the Supreme Court on an emergency basis. Although it was scheduled for a conference, no hearing ever was held.
Taitz notes that references to the case were erased from the docket of the Supreme Court on Jan. 21, shortly after Obama, the defendant, met with eight of the nine justices behind closed doors.
It happened just two days before her case was scheduled to be reviewed in conference.
Secondly, Taitz notes that in her conversation with Justice Antonin Scalia at a book-signing in Los Angeles several weeks ago, he appeared to have no knowledge of the cases that had been submitted.
She said she mentioned her case and those brought by Cort Wrotnowski, Philip Berg and Leo Donofrio.
“In the presence of several attorneys, law students and Secret Service agents Justice Scalia kept saying that he didn’t know anything … even though all of the plaintiffs have received notification that all of those cases were reviewed by all nine justices,” she said.
Taitz said she’s also concerned that the Supreme Court docket was somehow modified.
“Did somebody from outside break and enter into the computer system
of the Supreme Court or was it done by one of the overzealous employees who wanted to keep Obama in the White House?” she asked.
“I demand to see the printout of entries of both internal docket seen by justices and the external docket seen by the public to verify if those were identical at all times, particularly between January 20th and January 23rd,” she said.
She also raised the possibility that justices’ signatures may have been “stamped” on documentation.