Sheila Jackson Lee To Neil Cavuto: “It’s Not My Fault You Can’t Understand Logic”

Democriminal Sheila Jackson Lee believes that repealing Obamacare will kill Americans. How’s that for mamby-pamby, politically correct rhetoric. She also believes that ‘it’s not my fault you can’t understand logic’ (7:58) when Neil calls her out on the use of a senior citizen’s image (who is covered by Medicare) as a backdrop to talk about Obamacare.

Yep – weeze all two stooopid, even Neil Cavuto.

On an even lighter note….

AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SHEILA SAID SO!!!!!!!!!

House repeals healthcare law, 245-189

The House voted on Wednesday to repeal the sweeping healthcare law enacted last year, as Republicans made good on a central campaign pledge and laid down the first major policy marker of their new majority.

The vote was 245-189.

It’s a start, but remember that Sheila just made the statement that she wants to ‘amend’ Obamacare, not ‘repeal’. Obamacare is the foot in the door for these progressive asshats; DO NOT let Republicans back down.  Not one inch!

AYFKM? Right-Wing Christians Are The American Taliban

Daily Kos founder, Markos Moulitsas has written a new book naming right-wing Christians as the ‘American Taliban’ and stating that the American Taliban would behead secularists if they could.  Daily Kos Boy runs down the list of issues that Christians are against including being anti-women, education and science, and then states:

Well, right now the American Taliban is constrained by our set of laws and our constitution, and this is why they are attacking it.  This is why they want to eliminate half of the amendments in the US Constitution, this is why they are so hostile to the 1st amendment and freedom of religion.  As evidenced by Cordoba House, this so called mosque which is a community center two blocks away from Ground Zero.

It appears that Markos isn’t aware of all the people that are NOT Christians in this country that are against the victory mosque planned for Ground Zero and/or has not yet seen British Atheist, Pat Condell eloquently pointing out the stupidity of being political correct when it comes to the islamization of the West.   We don’t have a problem with islam, we have a huge problem with Sharia Law.

An excerpt from Pat Condell’s “No Mosque At Ground Zero” video linked above:

All you Americans that have been following the islamization of Europe from afar, with horrified incredulity, if any of you are still nursing the cozy illusion that it could never happen in your country, it’s time to wake up and rub those sleepy eyes because the moment of truth has arrived.

In case you haven’t heard, there’s a plan afoot to build a thirteen story islamic center and mosque a few yards from Ground Zero in New York. A plan that’s been enthusiastically welcomed by politicians and civic leaders, eager to show how tolerant they are at other peoples’ expense. Is it possible to be astonished but not surprised?

Apparently, it’s not enough that nearly 3,000 innocent people had to lose their lives in a hideous act of religious mass murder, but now their memory has to be insulted as well, and the religion that murdered them allowed to build a towering triumphalist mosque on the ground where they died.

Is America losing it’s mind?! It says alot about the people behind this scheme that they have the bad taste even to propose building a mosque in such a place, but to describe it as they have as a tribute to the victims is beyond bad taste, and shows a profound contempt for those who died. It would be hard to imagine a more provocative gesture short of standing on their graves and burning the American flag. Yet, how typical of Islam, with it’s own hair-trigger sensitivity to the slightest imagined insult, to do something so arrogant and so insensitive.

Video Source: TheBlaze

When Is It Going To Stop? When We Boot Them From Office?

When is this administration going to:

  1. Take Responsibility for their actions and stop blaming everybody else; and,
  2. Do their homework, know who they are keeping in their employ; and,
  3. Stop shifting responsibility to someone else for policies they believe in?

Today’s AYFKM? Award Goes To CA Dem Michael Honda…

…for pushing for illegal aliens to be included in any healthcare reform package.  What part of find them, send them back home, and close the borders does Michael Honda not understand?

Liberals seek health-care access for illegals

Fearful that they’re losing ground on immigration and health care, a group of House Democrats is pushing back and arguing that any health care bill should extend to all legal immigrants and allow illegal immigrants some access.

The Democrats, trying to stiffen their party’s spines on the contentious issue, say it’s unfair to bar illegal immigrants from paying their own way in a government-sponsored exchange. Legal immigrants, they say, regardless of how long they’ve been in the United States, should be able to get government-subsidized health care if they meet the other eligibility requirements.

“Legal permanent residents should be able to purchase their plans, and they should also be eligible for subsidies if they need it. Undocumented, if they can afford it, should be able to buy their own private plans. It keeps them out of the emergency room,” said Rep. Michael M. Honda, California Democrat and chairman of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus.

Rep. Steve King is seeing this right down the middle, and I applaud him for speaking the truth of the matter out loud.

Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, said proposals that include government coverage for illegal immigrants leave him incredulous.

“If anybody can, with a straight face, advocate that we should provide health insurance for people who broke into our country, broke our law and for the most part are criminals, I don’t know where they ever would draw the line,” he said.

California?  Are you freakin’ kidding us?  Are you going to fire this excuse for a civic leader?

H.R. 3591; Why Isn’t The Constitution Being Taught Already?

Since congress is back in session, I am following the bills and resolutions being put forward and there have been some whoppers this week.  Carolyn Maloney has already received Today’s AYFKM? Award for H.R. 3602, but I thought I might just throw a few more logs on the fire.

Can someone explain to me why the Dems all of a sudden feel it is necessary to throw $4,000,000 (per year) of our money at grants for Constitution and Citizenship Day Act of 2009?  Are they really saying that the Constitution is not being taught in our schools, and is this a way to amp up the voter turnout by registering eligible voters?  Do you think these Dems are jumping on the Tea Party wagon and trying to make themselves look less like radical socialists and more like Constitutionalists?  Do you think they realize how stupid they look by putting this forward?  I had to recite the Declaration of Independence at age 9…

From GovTrack:

H.R. 3591: Constitution and Citizenship Day Act of 2009

HR 3591 IH


1st Session

H. R. 3591

To establish a grant program to enhance existing secondary education programs for the purpose of teaching high school students about the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of the individual States.


September 17, 2009

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. WATSON, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Ms. WATERS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. WATT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor


To establish a grant program to enhance existing secondary education programs for the purpose of teaching high school students about the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of the individual States.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


This Act may be cited as the ‘Constitution and Citizenship Day Act of 2009’.


Part C of title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new subpart:

‘Subpart 6–Teaching of the Constitution


‘(a) Grant Program Authorized- The Secretary shall establish and implement a grant program, to be known as the ‘Constitution Day Grant Program’, under which the Secretary shall award grants on a competitive basis to local educational agencies and charter schools for the purposes of enhancing educational programs to teach students about the United States Constitution and the constitution of the State in which the grant recipient is located.

‘(b) Grantee Eligibility Requirements- Grants under this section may only be awarded to a local educational agency or charter school with established secondary educational programs to teach students about the United States Constitution and the constitution of the State in which the grant recipient is located.

‘(c) Operation of Educational Programs- An educational program funded by a grant under this section shall–

‘(1) occur on Constitution Day, September 17, of each calender year (or on the Monday immediately following Constitution Day, if Constitution Day falls on a Saturday or a Sunday);

‘(2) include assemblies, discussions, presentations, or events commemorating the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of the State in which the grant recipient is located;

‘(3) include efforts to reinforce existing Constitutional curricula conducted by the grant recipient; and

‘(4) make available to eligible students participating in such program the ability to register to vote.

‘(d) Voter Registration Laws- A grant recipient under this section shall abide by all applicable State and Federal voter registration laws.


‘(a) Secretary Created Process- The Secretary shall develop an application process for the grant program under this subpart, consistent with the requirements of this section.

‘(b) Grant Application Requirements- An application for a grant under this subpart shall–

‘(1) describe the educational activities to be funded by the grant; and

‘(2) provide assurances that the requirements of section 2371(c) will be met, and any additional assurances that the Secretary determines to be necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of this subpart.


‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 to carry out this subpart.’.

If Anybody Brought You Obama, This Guy Did….

If Anybody Brought You Obama, This Guy Did….

A picture is worth 1000 words….and what does this say about the 27 year old speechwriter who got the masses to drink the koolaid with his eloquent prose?  Now who is the retard?  Oh, and how is that “not withdrawing troops from Iraq” thang going for ya’all? (….bunch of dumba**es)

Obama Speechwriter Jon Favreau

Obama Speechwriter Jon Favreau

Bad Behavior has blocked 2582 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: