Okay, We Have Been Warned…Start Digging!

Hey Robert, I’ll get right on going to the back of the bus, sitting down, shutting up and getting in line for the fascist in charge when all those folks in Washington D.C.  start acting like Americans instead of goosestepping bambi wannabees who think that not making waves for the selected resident is gonna keep them in power.  I got news for ya, more than freedom is on the line right now.

Newt Gingrich, (who is NOT one of my favs as he is part of the republican ruling class and a CFR member like Timmie, Ruth, David Gergen, etc.), stood up today and made this twitter comment:

Imagine a judicial nominee said “my experience as a white man makes me better than a latina woman” new racism is no better than old racism.

Robert had the WH response all ready to go:

“I think it is probably important for anybody involved in this debate to be exceedingly careful with the way in which they have decided to describe different aspects of this impending confirmation. I think we’re satisfied when the people of America and the people of the senate get a chance to look at, ah, more than just the blog of a former lawmaker, that they’ll come to the same conclusion that the president did.”

Blah, Blah, Blah!

Robert? RACIST, RACIST, RACIST, RACIST.  Did I say it enough for you?  Sonia is a racist, sexist, liberal leftie judge who definitely appears to have been groomed by the same people as Gumby to help effect change on a global level.  I am not afraid of you because I KNOW there are more Americans that are getting more and more riled by the tsunami of sh*t coming out of Washington, D.C.  Come on over; we’ll debate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Okay, now that we have the racist label out of the way, let’s all start digging on what “The Powers That Be” are REALLY TRYING TO HIDE with all the deflection surrounding the racism event because once again Bambi’s administration COULD NOT VET someone properly.  It’s there, it’s hiding and it probably has something to do with business law, international relations, and/or corporations.

Republicans? Michael Steele? Are you listening?  Better stand up and fight this nomination.  Just sayin’ ya just don’t know what is going to happen tomorrow.

Sonia Sotomayor And Gun Control

For all of those people searching for “Sonia Sotomayor and Gun Control” – here is your story:

Fox News:

KEN BLACKWELL: Obama Declares War on America’s Gun Owners With Supreme Court Pick

President Obama’s nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor is a declaration of war against America’s gun owners and the Second Amendment to our Constitution. If gun owners mobilize and unite, it’s possible (though unlikely) to stop this radical nominee.

—————

According to Judge Sotomayor, if your state or city bans all guns the way Washington, D.C. did, that’s okay under the Constitution.

—————

Last year the Supreme Court handed down the landmark decision in D.C. v. Heller, holding that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to individual citizens in their private lives. The ruling marked a turning point in gun rights in this country.

In the past year, the biggest question courts now face is whether the Second Amendment applies to the states. That may sound crazy, but the reality is that the Bill of Rights only controls the federal government, it doesn’t apply directly to states or cities. Only the parts of the Bill of Rights that are “incorporated” through the Fourteenth Amendment apply to the states.

Since the Heller decision, only two federal appeals courts have written on the Second Amendment. That’s six judges out of about 170. Of those six, three said the Second Amendment does apply to the states. And those judges were out of the liberal Ninth Circuit in California, and included a judge appointed by Bill Clinton and another appointed by Jimmy Carter.  — Even leftist judges can get this.

But not Judge Sonia Sotomayor. She is one of only three federal appellate judges in America to issue a court opinion saying that the Second Amendment does not apply to states. The case was Maloney v. Cuomo, and it came down this past January.

That means if Chicago, or even the state of Illinois or New York, wants to ban you from owning any guns at all, even in your own house, that’s okay with her. According to Judge Sotomayor, if your state or city bans all guns the way Washington, D.C. did, that’s okay under the Constitution.

This issue could not be more important. Today, on the very day President Obama has announced Judge Sotomayor’s nomination, the National Rifle Association is arguing Second Amendment incorporation in court before the Seventh Circuit in a case challenging the Chicago ban on handguns.

If this case, or one like it, goes to the Supreme Court, Justice Sotomayor would say that Chicago can ban all your guns. If she can persuade her liberal colleagues on the Court to join her, it could become the law of the land that states and cities can ban guns. Should that happen, then you can expect anti-gun liberals in state legislatures to rush to pass new state laws doing exactly that.

The White House is telling us all about Judge Sotomayor’s compelling personal story — and it is an amazing story of what is possible “only in America.” But compelling personal stories are not the question. Miguel Estrada, whom President George W. Bush nominated to the D.C. Circuit appeals court and was planning on nominating to the Supreme Court, had a compelling story as a Hispanic immigrant who legally came to this country not even speaking English. Democrats filibustered Mr. Estrada.

Supporters point out that Judge Sotomayor was first appointed by George H.W. Bush for the federal trial court — before Bill Clinton elevated her to the Second Circuit appeals court. That’s true, but George H.W. Bush also gave us Justice David Souter, so clearly he wasn’t too careful about putting liberals on the federal bench. We can’t allow the left to hide behind the Bushes.

But when it comes to gun rights, we don’t need to guess. Judge Sotomayor has put in writing what she thinks. President Obama has nominated a radically anti-Second Amendment judge to be our newest Supreme Court justice.

Always Dig A Little Deeper

Always Dig A Little Deeper

sonio_sotomayorThe Media is all over the Sotomayor announcement today, and though I put up something earlier, one always has to look a little deeper when it comes to Bambi’s appointees.  Sotomayor is being touted as an appointee with the most time on the bench of anyone appointed in the last 70 years, and a breadth of experience not often seen; but what about that experience?

Sotomayor was a partner at the law firm of Pavia & Harcourt for 8 years, and what would this international law firm be most focused on?

Established in 1940, Pavia & Harcourt is a business law firm, concentrating in commercial and corporate law, banking, media and entertainment, real estate, litigation and arbitration, intellectual property, estate planning and administration, and immigration services.

Quite the smorgasboard of issues that Barack Obama wants to obtain control over.

We are based in New York City. With our experienced, American-trained attorneys fluent in Italian, French, Spanish, and Portuguese, Pavia & Harcourt offers a full range of legal services to companies, individuals, and Italian and French governmental organizations and agencies.

We represent Italian, French and other foreign entities and individuals who do business in the United States as well as American clients who do business in the U.S. and abroad.

As a citizen of the world, Barack Obama would definitely enjoy having this justice in his pocket in the coming months and years.

The Republicans that do not fight this nomination tooth and nail do so at the risk of all Americans.  Not only does this judge legislate from the bench with racial overtones, but she is already pre-disposed to business law and international affairs.  Barack Obama Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod definitely have a plan.

(As an aside, the number one search today on the Monster has been Sotomayor Gun Control.)

“The Court Of Appeals Is Where Policy Is Made”

“The Court Of Appeals Is Where Policy Is Made”

ladyjusticeI am not surprised by the new SCOTUS pick by the selected resident.  An actual scotus pick that would not be interpreting the law to set policy would be a surprise after all the justices that have been chosen and put on the bench in recent decades.  This one also has Biden-Gaffe-O-Meter written all over her….

Moving on….

(Author’s Note: Wouldn’t it be nice to have a justice that no one could label liberal or conservative, just an impartial constitutionalist?)

Bad Behavior has blocked 1671 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: