Following the Halloweenesque scare fest on Capitol Hill earlier this week — where National Intelligence director Dennis Blair and CIA director Leon Panetta warned of impending terrorist doom — the has House has The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act (H.R. 4061).
“The House today overwhelmingly passed a bill aimed at building up the United States’ cybersecurity army and expertise, amid growing alarm over the country’s vulnerability online,” reports the New York Times. “The bill, which passed 422-5, requires the Obama administration to conduct an agency-by-agency assessment of cybersecurity workforce skills and establishes a scholarship program for undergraduate and graduate students who agree to work as cybersecurity specialists for the government after graduation.”
As a side note, where are those scholarships for all the health care professionals that are going to be required to replace the doctors that quit, and take care of those extra 30-35 million people? That has been my biggest beef since the very beginning of this health care romp. How does one insure 30 million more people and provide them with the same level of care with only 856,000 doctors? But I digress…
Now, the next biggest installment in the loss of our liberty after the Patriot Act. If you want to continue to have a means of communicating other than carrier pigeon, better get on down to your local representatives’ office and let them know what you think. Forget emailing or calling; it is much harder to ignore you when you are standing in their doorway, (and that is what it is going to take).
The president would have the power to safeguard essential federal and private Web resources under draft Senate cybersecurity legislation.
According to an aide familiar with the proposal, the bill includes a mandate for federal agencies to prepare emergency response plans in the event of a massive, nationwide cyberattack.
The president would then have the ability to initiate those network contingency plans to ensure key federal or private services did not go offline during a cyberattack of unprecedented scope, the aide said.
Ultimately, the legislation is chiefly the brainchild of Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee, respectively. Both lawmakers have long clamored for a federal cybersecurity bill, charging that current measures — including the legislation passed by the House last year — are too piecemeal to protect the country’s Web infrastructure.
Their renewed focus arrives on the heels of two, high-profile cyberattacks last month: A strike on Google, believed to have originated in China, and a separate, more disjointed attack that affected thousands of businesses worldwide.
Rockefeller and Snowe’s forthcoming bill would establish a host of heretofore absent cybersecurity prevention and response measures, an aide close to the process said. The bill will “significantly [raise] the profile of cybersecurity within the federal government,” while incentivizing private companies to do the same, according to the aide.
Additionally, it will “promote public awareness” of Internet security issues, while outlining key protections of Americans’ civil liberties on the Web, the aide continued.
Privacy groups are nonetheless likely to take some umbrage at Rockefeller and Snowe’s latest effort, an early draft of which leaked late last year.
When early reports predicted the cybersecurity measure would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency,” online privacy groups said they felt that would endow the White House with overly ambiguous and far-reaching powers to regulate the Internet.
The bill will still contain most of those powers, and a “vast majority” of its other components “remain unchanged,” an aide with knowledge of the legislation told The Hill. But both the aide and a handful of tech insiders who support the bill have nonetheless tried to dampen skeptics’ concerns, reminding them the president already has vast — albeit lesser-known — powers to regulate the Internet during emergencies.
It is unclear when Rockefeller and Snowe will finish their legislation. And the ongoing debate over healthcare reform, financial regulatory reform, jobs bills and education fixes could postpone action on the floor for many months.
Both lawmakers heavily emphasized the need for such a bill during a Senate Commerce Committee cybersecurity hearing on Wednesday.
“Too much is at stake for us to pretend that today’s outdated cybersecurity policies are up to the task of protecting our nation and economic infrastructure,” Rockefeller said. “We have to do better and that means it will take a level of coordination and sophistication to outmatch our adversaries and minimize this enormous threat.”
So fellow Patriots, how do you feel about losing your money, your land, your food, your guns, your means of communication, and YOUR CONSTITUTION?
Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.
They’re not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.
The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.
“I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness,” said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. “It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill.”
Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller’s aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.
“The language has changed but it doesn’t contain any real additional limits,” EFF’s Tien says. “It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)…The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There’s no provision for any administrative process or review. That’s where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it.”
Translation: If your company is deemed “critical,” a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network.
American Progressives hard at work establishing fascism.
WASHINGTON – Barack Obama’s nominee for “regulatory czar” has advocated a “Fairness Doctrine” for the Internet that would require opposing opinions be linked and also has suggested angry e-mails should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour cooling off period.
The revelations about Cass Sunstein, Obama’s friend from the University of Chicago Law School and nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, come in a new book by Brad O’Leary, “Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech.” OIRA will oversee regulation throughout the U.S. government.
Sunstein also has argued in his prolific literary works that the Internet is anti-democratic because of the way users can filter out information of their own choosing.
“A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government,” he wrote. “Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom’s name.” (Are You Freakin’ Kidding Me?)
Sunstein first proposed the notion of imposing mandatory “electronic sidewalks” for the Net. These “sidewalks” would display links to opposing viewpoints. Adam Thierer, senior fellow and director of the Center for Digital Media Freedom at the Progress and Freedom Center, has characterized the proposal as “The Fairness Doctrine for the Internet.”
Bambi’s take on Sunstein?
“As one of America’s leading constitutional scholars, Cass Sunstein has distinguished himself in a range of fields, including administrative law and policy, environmental law, and behavioral economics,” said Obama at his nomination of his regulatory czar. “He is uniquely qualified to lead my administration’s regulatory reform agenda at this crucial stage in our history. Cass is not only a valued adviser, he is a dear friend and I am proud to have him on my team.”
“It’s hard to imagine President Obama nominating a more dangerous candidate for regulatory czar than Cass Sunstein,” he says. “Not only is Sunstein an animal-rights radical, but he also seems to have a serious problem with our First Amendment rights. Sunstein has advocated everything from regulating the content of personal e-mail communications, to forcing nonprofit groups to publish information on their websites that is counter to their beliefs and mission. Of course, none of this should be surprising from a man who has said that ‘limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government.’ If it were up to Obama and Sunstein, everything we read online – right down to our personal e-mail communications – would have to be inspected and approved by the federal government.”
Make sure you do a fly-by on WND and read about the “Civility Check” idea about holding angry emails, and don’t forget about Jay Rockefeller’s S773 and S778 which are both currently in committee.
You know you have Congress on the run when articles like the one that follows are printed, and Nancy Pelosi calls the tea parties “astroturfing”. The dingdongs in Washington, D.C. have realized that even with the smear job that the MSM has been doing lately after completely ignoring the protests, this MOVEMENT IS REAL and GROWING! You know that Axelrod was glued to FOX yesterday and has a game plan this morning using ACORN and the Obama Army to combat a real grassroots push to rein in this unconstitutional government.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) blasted “tea party” protests yesterday, labeling the activities “despicable” and shameful.”
“The ‘tea parties’ being held today by groups of right-wing activists, and fueled by FOX News Channel, are an effort to mislead the public about the Obama economic plan that cuts taxes for 95 percent of Americans and creates 3.5 million jobs,” Schakowsky said in a statement.
“It’s despicable that right-wing Republicans would attempt to cheapen a significant, honorable moment of American history with a shameful political stunt,” she added. “Not a single American household or business will be taxed at a higher rate this year. Made to look like a grassroots uprising, this is an Obama bashing party promoted by corporate interests, as well as Republican lobbyists and politicians.”
I want to thank Jan for letting us know that we are despicable and shameful people. Everybody add Jan’s name to the list of traitors who are name-calling average everyday hard-working Americans that are so incredibly self reliant that we just kept rolling with the punches and not saying anything until DC tried to take everything from us, our children, and our grandchildren in the last 2 months, i.e. money, homes, land. What’s next; food (HR875), guns (HR45), the internet (S773), and installing your messiah as dictator (HJ Res 5)?
We have a message for you Jan, and the rest of your buddies in Washington…we ARE NOT right-wing activists; WE ARE AMERICANS, we are democrats, republicans, independents, and non-affiliated voters who are actually in the top half of the class and have enough common sense to see where all this spending and government control is going, AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO ABUSE THE POWER THAT WAS GIVEN TO YOU ANYMORE!
Get ready for more tea parties ladies and gentlemen; saddle up!
CONGRESS; GET READY TO BE FIRED!
And now, your favorite dipstick in Congress:
Nazi Nancy Pelosi trying to “encourage” the bots to fall back in line:
I want you all to know that $400 or $800 (depending) that you are getting back spread out over your weekly or bi-weekly checks is coming out of my boss’ pocket, my pocket, the pockets of every small business owner, your children and your children’s children. This Congress, the last Congress, Bambi, W, the Treasury and THE FED are bankrupting this country.
WASHINGTON — Cyberspies have penetrated the U.S. electrical grid and left behind software programs that could be used to disrupt the system, according to current and former national-security officials.
The spies came from China, Russia and other countries, these officials said, and were believed to be on a mission to navigate the U.S. electrical system and its controls. The intruders haven’t sought to damage the power grid or other key infrastructure, but officials warned they could try during a crisis or war.
“The Chinese have attempted to map our infrastructure, such as the electrical grid,” said a senior intelligence official. “So have the Russians.”
The espionage appeared pervasive across the U.S. and doesn’t target a particular company or region, said a former Department of Homeland Security official. “There are intrusions, and they are growing,” the former official said, referring to electrical systems. “There were a lot last year.
Many of the intrusions were detected not by the companies in charge of the infrastructure but by U.S. intelligence agencies, officials said. Intelligence officials worry about cyber attackers taking control of electrical facilities, a nuclear power plant or financial networks via the Internet.
Authorities investigating the intrusions have found software tools left behind that could be used to destroy infrastructure components, the senior intelligence official said. He added, “If we go to war with them, they will try to turn them on.”
Officials said water, sewage and other infrastructure systems also were at risk.
“Over the past several years, we have seen cyberattacks against critical infrastructures abroad, and many of our own infrastructures are as vulnerable as their foreign counterparts, ” Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair recently told lawmakers. “A number of nations, including Russia and China, can disrupt elements of the U.S. information infrastructure.”
Last week, Senate Democrats introduced a proposal that would require all critical infrastructure companies to meet new cybersecurity standards and grant the president emergency powers over control of the grid systems and other infrastructure.
Specialists at the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit, a nonprofit research institute, said attack programs search for openings in a network, much as a thief tests locks on doors. Once inside, these programs and their human controllers can acquire the same access and powers as a systems administrator.
The White House review of cybersecurity programs is studying ways to shield the electrical grid from such attacks, said James Lewis, who directed a study for the Center for Strategic and International Studies and has met with White House reviewers.
Go here to read “Jay Rockefeller Is Coming For the Internet”.
When we saw that video, we KNEW they were coming for our means of communication. For those of you that are just joining the information age, the scenario goes something likes this, and I am paraphrasing as this is by no means the whole time-line. I know my readers are going to add other important events to the list.
In the 1880’s Andrew Carnegie started talking about putting the British Empire and the American Empire together.
1902 – The Pilgrims Society of Great Britain is formed.
1903 – The Pilgrims Society of the United States is formed.
The American aristocracy starts buying into all forms of business and controlling boards.
1910 – The Jekyll Island consortium of NY Bankers puts together the Federal Reserve Act. (Paul Warburg)
1913 – The Federal Reserve Act is passed and the central banking system is set up.
1919 – The League of Nations covenant is written.
1920 – The League of Nations begins.
1921 – The Council on Foreign Relations is formed by Paul Warburg.
The American aristocracy starts foundations, i.e. Carnegie, Ford, Rockefeller.
1929 – The Great Depression starts.
1945 – The United Nations begins.
The American aristocracy starts funding the campaigns of politicians that want to become the American Aristocracy.
The American aristocracy starts running their sons, and later daughters for public office.
The American aristocracy starts institutes, think tanks, and groups funded by the foundations.
The Community Reinvestment Act is amended to allow groups like ACORN to pressure banks with the help of Congress to give loans to people that could NEVER afford them.
The Housing Bubble is created.
Annette Nazareth created the voluntary program intended to supervise large investment banks including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and the now-defunct Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch.
AIG and the New York Banks are allowed to grow to immense proportions.
911 occurs and the campaign against the Constitution and civil liberties begins in earnest; i.e. Homeland Security and the Patriot Act.
The Iraq war starts thereby draining the treasury and demoralizing the country.
The housing bubble collapses.
Americans are instantly impoverished and demoralized.
The usurpers-in-charge are put in the White House and the unconstitutional laws continue.
The White House and Democratic Congress with the help of a few traitorous Republicans are jamming through INSANE monetary bills.
Billions of taxpayer money is funneled through AIG to the aristocracy owned banks here and abroad.
Trillions of dollars go from the Fed to the aristocracy’s banks.
The White House and Democratic Congress are trying to pass laws that would require mandatory service, the food police for home gardens among other food producers, and an end to the term limits for the president.
AND WE NOW HAVE Jay Rockefeller of one of the American Aristocracy calling for S773 and S778 along with Olympia Snowe. Please note that the control of the CyberSecurity Czar falls under the control of the Executive Branch.
A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes.
A pair of bills introduced in the U.S. Senate would grant the White House sweeping new powers to access private online data, regulate the cybersecurity industry and even shut down Internet traffic during a declared “cyber emergency.”
Senate bills No. 773 and 778, introduced by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., are both part of what’s being called the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, which would create a new Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor, reportable directly to the president and charged with defending the country from cyber attack.
A working draft of the legislation obtained by an Internet privacy group also spells out plans to grant the Secretary of Commerce access to all privately owned information networks deemed to be critical to the nation’s infrastructure “without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule or policy restricting such access.”
And here is an interesting tidbit I ran across while researching Preston Bush, the granddaddy to the crazy Bush 2 that gave us the Iraq War and the Patriot Act. No copyright infringement here. It explains how and why the Bush family dynasty was welcomed to the inner circle. I can already see how this is going to end, and it is not going to be pretty. We now know the who; the why and the how is becoming more apparent each day.
So fellow Patriots, how do you feel about losing your money, your land, your food, your guns, your means of communication, and YOUR CONSTITUTION?
UPDATE: 4/6/09: Shtuey sent the link and I uploaded it – send it around bloggers (please).