Bill O’Reilly’s politically incorrect truth about muslims killing innocents on 9.11 sends Joy and Whoopi into a liberal left indignation-fest. They are so upset that they walk off stage, and then are chastised by Babs herself over their childish behavior. Elizabeth Hasselbeck makes an excellent point when she reminds the viewers that Chairman Zero himself stopped using the description ‘terrorists’ and replaced it with radical muslims, thereby tying terrorism closer to the Islamic faith.
There is truth, and then there is the spin machine that the libtard moonbats want you to believe.
What do you think would happen to Joy and Whoopi if they were forced to listen to historical facts about Islam?
Lt. Col. Allen West answers a blogger’s (and former marine) question about whether or not Islam has been warped to attack America…(Hint: No).
Are you tired of the progressives inciting violence, and blaming the tea parties and the conservatives for all of their tactics? The Monster will continue to take the high road and call for the ‘perp walk’ for the gangsters in the District of Criminals.
…and the ‘right-wing rebellion’ of the tea parties. Mark seems to know us better than ourselves, since I did not realize that I am secretly terrified of the federal government building concentration camps that we can be herded off to by foreign soldiers. I also did not realize that the democrats and indies that come to this site were double agents for the right-wing conservative movement. My readers have totally snowed me, and I thought I had a clue about the pulse of the people.
How is it that a member of a organization that “tracks hate groups” could think it a good idea to attack the Oathkeepers. At this point, considering what we don’t know about our federal government, I’m glad the Oathkeepers are standing on the wall. How about you? Mr. Potok seems to be overly concerned that the Oathkeepers include police officers that could be laboring under paranoid ideas and then pull a weapon. I’m more concerned going to the store after dark and getting mugged. As much as I detest Bill O’Reilly, I must give him credit for offering an invitation to the Oathkeepers for an interview on tomorrow’s show. We will have to see what transpires.
On a totally different but related note, I have been background processing, and am currently working on an op-ed piece about Glenn Beck and the current media circus surrounding the tea party movement. I wanted to see if my readers think the rule below seems altogether too familiar right now.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and ‘frozen.’…
“…any target can always say, ‘Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?’ When your ‘freeze the target,’ you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments…. Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the ‘others’ come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target…’
My message to you – stand together, don’t scatter. There are many more of us now than ever before.
Is anybody amazed that Sarah is not accepting a speaking fee from the Tea Party patriots, and would rather instead have that money be contributed to conservative, patriotic, American candidates? (My description)
If someone puts up Alan Colmes wondering “How long she will keep this job” comment, I will post it.
Part 2 – the 60 Minutes piece (no one can make this crap up):