Immigration Reform Includes National Biometric ID Card

Pay attention people, the national biometric ID card is part of the immigration reform bill being proposed by those two progressive fascists, republican Lindsey Graham and democrat Chuckie Schumer. As Judge Napolitano states, the Real ID Act was passed in 2005 authorizing a national ID card but the states have resisted it.

If this bill passes with this authority intact, you will no longer be free men and women to do as you please within the confines of the law; you will be cows, or worse, slaves to be kept track of.  At what point are we going to tell the government to shove it by either not paying taxes or taking an unpaid one week vacation (also known as a National Strike) – quickly followed by mass firings (of elected officials turned traitors)?

Read the Dems’ outline just released on Wednesday, here.
(H/T BB)

Amnesty: Obama Attempting To Retain His Lavish Lifestyle

Amnesty: Obama Attempting To Retain His Lavish Lifestyle

Louis and Marie

Obama has to make illegal alien amnesty an issue, and soon, if he wants to run for re-election and have a prayer of living the lifestyle that he and Mishy have become accustomed to.

On 10.5.2009, I posted this piece about illegal aliens putting Obama back in the WH.

Who Wouldn’t Vote For A pResident That Made You Legal?

Monster readers know that the pResident and his administration have ALWAYS been about distraction and deflection, so the rapidly approaching illegal alien amnesty flying under the radar of healthcare reform, Afghanistan, cap and tax, and flying to Copenhagen for the Olympics is no surprise.

This administration appears to be pulling out all the stops when it comes to making sure that the pResident achieves re-election; see ACORN, the Census, Illegal Immigration, etc.  How many of those 12 million newly legal aliens would NOT vote for the guy that gave them one of the greatest gifts one can achieve in the world; American Citizenship.

On 1.3.2010, I put up this post about Luis Gutierrez’s immigration amnesty bill and our government spending millions of dollars of our tax money to get the illegals to come out of the woodwork and be counted.   Don’t think there is a correlation between being counted and gaining citizenship?  Keep reading.

So You Want To Stay In Power Forever? $340 Million And Amnesty

After watching the Obama machine with the blessings of the DNC mafia run right over the Hillary campaign and millions of democratic voters, Americans that believe in the Constitution and the rights it assures have been on high alert when it comes to the 2010, 2012 elections and beyond. As soon as we heard that the Census Bureau was being moved under the West Wing, we all knew that the caucus fraud that occurred during the democratic primaries was being taken to the next level to assure dems retained their seats. They pulled it off the first time, why fix something that is not broken, and will have the full weight of the Executive Branch legitimizing it a second time? Then add in Luis Gutierrez’s immigration amnesty bill and the preparations coming from the White House, and thinking Americans can see the light on the next locomotive about to flatten us.

To assure that those millions of illegals are counted before they are blessed with citizenship (with the wink and a nod persuasion for their votes), the pResident is spending $340 MILLION DOLLARS of our tax money to promote the 2010 Census to everyone including anyone watching the Superbowl pre-game. The rape and pillage of our nation’s treasury and our grandchildrens’ piggybanks continues unabated.

Today, that legislation is being moved by Obama himself.  People, you are not stupid, we have to stay three steps ahead of the marxist, communist, fascist, ‘ who knows what’ in the White House.

Obama looking to give new life to immigration reform

In an effort to advance a bill through Congress before midterm elections, the president meets with two senators who have spent months trying to craft legislation.

Reporting from Washington – Despite steep odds, the White House has discussed prospects for reviving a major overhaul of the nation’s immigration laws, a commitment that President Obama has postponed once already.

Obama took up the issue privately with his staff Monday in a bid to advance a bill through Congress before lawmakers become too distracted by approaching midterm elections.

In the session, Obama and members of his Domestic Policy Council outlined ways to resuscitate the effort in a White House meeting with two senators — Democrat Charles E. Schumer of New York and Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — who have spent months trying to craft a bill.

According to a person familiar with the meeting, the White House may ask Schumer and Graham to at least produce a blueprint that could be turned into legislative language.

The basis of a bill would include a path toward citizenship for the 10.8 million people living in the U.S. illegally. Citizenship would not be granted lightly, the White House said. Undocumented workers would need to register, pay taxes and pay a penalty for violating the law. Failure to comply might result in deportation. (emphasis mine)

Participants in the White House gathering also pointed to an immigration rally set for March 21 in Washington as a way to spotlight the issue and build needed momentum.

Though proponents of an immigration overhaul were pleased that the White House wasn’t abandoning the effort, they also wanted Obama to take on a more assertive role, rather than leave it to Congress to work out a compromise.

Immigration is a delicate issue for the White House. After promising to revamp in his first year of office what many see as a fractured system, Obama risks angering a growing, politically potent Latino constituency if he defers the goal until 2011.

Among proponents, there is a consensus that a proposal must move by April or early May to have a realistic chance of passing this year. If that deadline slips, Congress’ focus is likely to shift to the November elections, making it impossible to take up major legislation.

“There’s no question that this is a heavy lift and the window is narrowing,” said Janet Murguia, president and chief executive of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino advocacy group.

A Turning Point For Republicans?

I must, once again, state for the record that I have been an indie for a very long time, and have never been registered as a republican.  In keeping with the discussion that was started on the last post about O’Reilly and a third party, here is information that may clarify my position about registering as a republican for the 2010 and 2012 elections.  Republicans are not going to leave their party, and the tipping point for conservatives getting control of said party appears to have been reached.  So what would be the best way to keep Obama from getting re-elected; join a third party or join the republicans?  You tell me.

Rasmussen has released poll results this morning about South Carolinians’ views of their senators.

51% of SC Republicans Say Party Should Be More Like DeMint Than Graham

Two of the most influential Republicans in the U.S. Senate these days come from South Carolina, Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham. But Graham’s efforts to work with majority Democrats on some issues has angered many GOP voters in the state, even prompting efforts to censure him.

Fifty-one percent (51%) of Republican voters in South Carolina say the GOP should be more like DeMint, who’s a staunch conservative, than like Graham, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in the state.

Thirty-two percent (32%) of the state’s Republican voters think the party should model itself more after Graham, and 18% are not sure which one is the best role model.

Among all voters in the state, 38% say Republicans should be more like DeMint, while 32% say they should be like Graham. Thirty percent (30%) aren’t sure.

Sixty-five percent (65%) of South Carolina Republicans have a favorable view of Graham, but 85% feel that way about DeMint. Republicans are nearly twice as likely to have a very favorable view of DeMint compared to his fellow GOP senator – 57% to 30%.

Perhaps more tellingly, 18% of GOP voters have a very unfavorable view of Graham, while just three percent (3%) say the same of DeMint.

Your Daily Glenn Beck; 10.14.09: Being Dragged Towards Marxism (ACORN REFUNDING UPDATE)

(See Update below)

Glenn starts with Obama’s broken promises about lobbyists and a single payer healthcare plan leading right into America being dragged towards marxism, and let’s not forget about the red phone.

********

UPDATE: ACORN REFUNDING

Readers are looking for information about Michelle Bachman and the refunding of ACORN. Here are two vids; the first from KTLKFM on 10.08.09 , and the second from today’s Glenn Beck program.

Glenn’s view of Lindsey Graham:

First Honorary Democratic A** Award – Lindsey Graham

To borrow a line from Glenn Beck; “You are the Protectors of Liberty”, which means you have a couple of questions to ask yourself.

  1. Am I a true patriot that believes in the principles laid down by the Constitution and the Founding Fathers, or am I a socialist sheep that would be running for South America if I were a Nazi SS officer?
  2. What, when, where, and how am I willing to protect these principles and liberties for myself, my family and future generations?

No answer required; it is just something you need to start thinking about and have clear answers for those questions.  Also, you might want to think about looking beyond the immediate disenfranchisement problem.

My first Honorary Democratic A** Award given to Republicans that have hit their knees for the Messiah is awarded to Lindsey Graham.  Let’s leave Snowe, Collins and Spector out of this for the time being.  They get their very own special award.  Ask the right question; “What is the payoff for Republicans to give up the true Republican Party Principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and small government?”

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has had an I.V. line of koolaid inserted over the weekend:

THOMAS JEFFERSON: (These quotes sum up what a Founding Father thought about a National Bank):

“It has always been denied by the republican party in this country, that the Constitution had given the power of incorporation to Congress. On the establishment of the Bank of the United States, this was the great ground on which that establishment was combated; and the party prevailing supported it only on the argument of its being an incident to the power given them for raising money.” –Thomas Jefferson to Dr. Maese, 1809. ME 12:231

“[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution… An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?” –Thomas Jefferson to Albert Gallatin, 1803. ME 10:437

“Scenes are now to take place as will open the eyes of credulity and of insanity itself, to the dangers of a paper medium abandoned to the discretion of avarice and of swindlers.” –Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814. ME 14:189

“The States should be applied to, to transfer the right of issuing circulating paper to Congress exclusively, in perpetuum.” –Thomas Jefferson to John W. Eppes, 1813. ME 13:276

“The evils of this deluge of paper money are not to be removed until our citizens are generally and radically instructed in their cause and consequences, and silence by their authority the interested clamors and sophistry of speculating, shaving, and banking institutions. Till then, we must be content to return quoad hoc to the savage state, to recur to barter in the exchange of our property for want of a stable common measure of value, that now in use being less fixed than the beads and wampum of the Indian, and to deliver up our citizens, their property and their labor, passive victims to the swindling tricks of bankers and mountebankers.” –Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1819. ME 15:185

Bad Behavior has blocked 1550 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: