I put the following message in the sidebar a couple weeks ago asking when somebody in Congress would do the right thing and call for Zero’s impeachment over his unbelievable unconstitutional handling of the Libya attack. I have been waiting ever since; until tonight. Surprise, surprise.
Two Week Old Message
Of course it isn’t a patriot or statesman in Congress pushing for Chairman Zero’s impeachment, it’s a real constitutional lawyer that doesn’t appear to like ‘globalist‘ presidents very much.
Bruce Fein, a former Reagan administration official in the Department of Justice and chairman of American Freedom Agenda writes in his 15-page argument of Obama’s course that “Barack Hussein Obama has mocked the rule of law, endangered the very existence of the Republic and the liberties of the people, and perpetrated an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”
Fein is a small-government conservative who worked on the impeachment of President Bill Clinton and also called for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, and his work doesn’t represent the Republican Party line. But it comes as some Republicans on the Hill, led by Senator Rand Paul, object vociferously to Obama’s decision to strike targets in Libya without Congressional authorization.
“He’s been more bold than any other president,” said Fein, who said Obama has failed to secure congressional approval for his military action in a much more brazen way than previous administrations.
“If he can wipe out the war powers authorization, why can’t he wipe out Congress’s authority to spend?” asked Fein. ” If we’re going to be a government of laws, and not descend into empire, this is Caesar crossing the Rubicon.”
Fein said a number of Congressional offices have expressed interest in his proposal.
“They actually need to defend constitutional prerogatives,” said Fein. “There’s definitely been interest on the Hill. There’s at least two dozen who have been open to the idea that this is a serious constitutional crisis.”
Fein’s articles of impeachment discuss the run-up to the Libya conflict and conclude, “In all of this, President Barack Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.”
The article of impeachment and three subsections are after the jump.
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has usurped the exclusive power of Congress to initiate war under Article I, section 8, clause 11 of the United States Constitution by unilaterally commencing war against the Republic of Libya on March 19, 2011, declaring that Congress is powerless to constrain his conduct of the war, and claiming authority in the future to commence war unilaterally to advance whatever he ordains is in the national interest. By so doing and declaring, Barack Hussein Obama has mocked the rule of law, endangered the very existence of the Republic and the liberties of the people, and perpetrated an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor as hereinafter elaborated.
Hit the link above to read the rest.
Personally, I want this ass-clown booted for being ineligible as a dual citizen at birth, making every person he has ever appointed and every bill he has signed null and void…but he is too well protected by the powers that be for that to happen, and I don’t want to hear one freakin’ word about Hillary or McCain being unable to find the evidence. They are all playing for the same damn team…and it ain’t ours.
I spoke with a few folks today to let them know that the situation with Egypt is the trigger for all sorts of global nastiness that is already impacting us here in the U.S. (The price of gas here has gone up ten cents in four days.) I do believe that I actually stated that we had gone over the cliff, were in freefall, and had not yet hit the rocks below. That part is going to really suck when the ground finally reaches up for us. Are your first-aid kits stocked?
It appears that I may be correct while reading the following linked story from the AP which states top level envoys from almost all of our embassies throughout the world have been called by Hillary to a ‘first of it’s kind’ global pow-wow at the State Department on Monday.
(Editor’s Note: See Update after the post.) We KNOW we are underwater, ‘9.6%’ unemployment, 48 million Americans on foodstamps, numerous states in budget shortfall, The Fed printing money like there is no tomorrow, and we are staring inflation dead in the eye. Big Government does not even bat an eye; the day after the pResident’s debt commission comes out with a proposal that features cutting Social Security benefits to seniors, and the mortgage interest credit for Americans than can still actually own property, Secretary of State Clinton promises ANOTHER $150 MILLION to the Palestinian Authority. ARE YOU FREAKIN’ KIDDING ME?
I guess Newsweek was correct in stating that “We Are All Socialists Now”, they just forgot to add the byline “…And New World Order Globalists”.
We are just a bunch of stupid corporate owned moos to allow this financial terrorism to go on…AND WHEN DO THE BANKERS’ ARRESTS START?
Earlier, Clinton announced that the United States has transferred $150 million in new aid to the Palestinian Authority to help close its budget gap.
“This new funding will help the Palestinian Authority pay down its debt, continue to deliver services and security to its people, and keep the progress going,” she said. “It will support our work together to expand Palestinians’ access to schools, clinics and clean drinking water in both the West Bank and Gaza [Strip].”
The secretary of state said the funds bring U.S. direct budget assistance to the Palestinian Authority to $225 million this year. Overall support and investment to the Palestinians is nearly $600 million for the year.
I wonder how much American cash contributed to this? Remember, keep the moos happily shopping and they won’t riot.
According to Bob Woodward being interviewed on CNN, an Obama/Clinton ticket in 2012 ‘is on the table‘. My question for my former democrat readers is would you vote for this ticket if Hillary is on it? (Conservatives; try to keep the verbal abuse to a minimum please.)
(CNSNews.com)–News Corporation CEO Rupert Murdoch said he supports amnesty for “law abiding” illegal immigrants because as legal residents they can help the nation’s economy by adding to “our tax base.” He also said he supports securing the border to prevent more illegal immigrants from entering the United States.
At a hearing on Thursday before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Murdoch testified, “I joined Mayor [Michael] Bloomberg in organizing the Partnership for a New American Economy because I believe that all Americans should have a vital interest in fixing our broken immigration system so we can continue to compete in the 21st century global economy.”
“While supporting complete and proper closure of all our borders to future illegal immigrants, our partnership advocates reform that gives a path to citizenship for responsible, law-abiding immigrants who are in the U.S. today without proper authority,” said Murdoch, who was born in Australia and is a naturalized U.S. citizen.
Translation: Illegal aliens that have entered the US criminally are really just people without proper authorization – so it’s okay to give them the gold star of citizenship instead of throwing their asses in jail and then deporting them.
The News Corp. CEO, whose company owns the Fox News Channel, further said it is fiscally unfeasible to deport the illegal immigrants who are already in the United States, which he estimated as totaling about 12 million people.
Rupert Murdoch’s views would be a main reason for people to lack trust in Fox News. Is it any wonder people are questioning Glenn Beck’s motives?
“It is nonsense to talk of expelling 12 million people,” testified Murdoch. “Not only is it impractical, it is cost prohibitive.”
Murdoch cited a study that gauged “the price of mass deportation at $285 billion over five years,” which amounts to $57 billion per year, adding that “there are better ways to spend our money.”
“A full path to legalization–requiring unauthorized immigrants (Editor’s Note: Criminals) to register, undergo a security check, pay taxes and learn English–would bring these immigrants out of a shadow economy and add to our tax base,” said Murdoch.
It doesn’t add to the tax base if they are not working or are working under the table. It also will create a situation where more Americans continue to be unemployed or underemployed; therefore weakening the tax base even more. (Which, apparently, is the idea besides another factor stated below.)
Murdoch appears to want more people to be able to vote for the Democrats Progressive Globalist Party, and finish the absorption of the US into the United Nations framework. Remember, he is a huge supporter of Globalist Hillary Clinton. It has been almost amusing to watch the Obama fascists duke it out with the well-heeled globalists. Only problem is that the average American is getting bloody during the tussle, and the moos still haven’t figured it out.
Hit the title link above to read the rest of the stupidity.
(Editor’s Note: As with all the information presented in the ‘Noose’ series of articles, please keep an open mind, read the material and corresponding links, do the homework and stop being JUST A MOO producing a revenue stream for the powers that be. Be skeptical; I am. Ask the hard questions. Now more Americans are awake than ever; join us and help us find the ‘real truth’ that has been hidden for centuries. The more people turning over rocks, the faster the truth is going to be known.)
Over the course of the last two months traveling through the labyrinth, I have found it incredibly hard to find a starting point for this series of articles. In desperation, I finally decided to start writing about current events and how discovered research applied to today’s news. Take, for example, the run on Kabul Bank, and the corresponding actions by Afghanistan Central Bank and our Treasury which leads back to the UN, IMF, The Fed, etc. We all know who the players are, what we haven’t been able to prove exactly the combination of who, what, where, when, and how when it comes to wars, national bankruptcies, treaties, government as corporations, and politicians as corporate entities because A) we have been blanketed with thousands of pages in hopes of demoralizing us, and B) much of the documentation is hidden from the public. We know this. To give you some idea of the scope, I spent the morning reading the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783, Bush 41’s EO 12803, and Clinton’s EO 13037 after I had come up empty-handed looking for monetary information on the U.S. Treasury setting up the Afghanistan Central Bank. I know our treasury spent our money on yet another central bank, but find out how much of the billions we have poured into Afghanistan went to establish the bank and anything other than 2002 as a date? Nada. What about Iraq’s central bank which came into existence in 1956 and was nationalized in 1964? Did it change when our government toppled Saddam’s regime? Does it look like The Federal Reserve? What do you think?
The CBI law establishes a Financial Services Tribunal empowered to review decisions and orders of the CBI including actions taken by a conservator or receiver under the Banking Law. The Tribunal is not authorized to review CBI decisions or actions concerning monetary policy and exchange rate policy. The Tribunal will comprise panels of judges appointed by the Minister of Justice. Articles 63-70
What about this?
Prior Law The prior law governing the Central Bank of Iraq was the Central Bank of Iraq Law No. 64 of 1976. The prior law is repealed by the new law. Article 73 In July the Coalition Provisional Authority issued CPA Order No. 18, “Measures to Ensure the Independence of the Central Bank of Iraq.” This order suspended the authority of the CBI to lend to Iraqi Government Ministries and gave the CBI authority to determine and implement monetary and credit policy without the approval of the Ministry of Finance.
Who then would be giving the Central Bank of Iraq their marching orders considering the state the country is still in?
Regulating the banking sector for promoting a competitive and stable financial system
I am currently contemplating turning my living room wall into a whiteboard to keep track of all the different parties and agendas in play. What I have been able to ascertain is that the United Nations appears to be ‘the face’ and the hub from which all the different coalitions and policies are being sent forth; equivalent to the biggest airport terminal in the world. I would dearly love to know exactly who owns the airport; ‘The International Banksters’ isn’t specific enough for me. I want names; all their names.
Please take five minutes to watch this video and I guarantee you will be as skeptical as I still am, but more questions than answers still remain. Why does our government vote against its constituents? Why does the FBI consider ‘American Sovereigns’ to be domestic terrorists? Why have the police been para-militarized, and over-react on a daily basis? Why have doctors stopped curing conditions and only treat symptomology? Why has Monsanto been allowed to run wild in Iraq and Afghanistan? Why did WE spend $582 Million to build an Embassy complex in Iraq? Why has the Federal Reserve been allowed to prosper when they have done nothing except the opposite of their supposed mission to ensure economic stability? Why does any nation follow any proposal the United Nations puts forward when nothing but wars and genocide have happened under their ‘peaceful’ watch?
After a year of humiliating setbacks, United Nations Secretary General Ban ki-Moon and about 60 of his top lieutenants — the top brass of the entire U.N. system — spent their Labor Day weekend at a remote Austrian Alpine retreat, discussing ways to put their sprawling organization in charge of the world’s agenda.
Glenn initially had the same reaction many Americans had to the news of the Cordoba Initiative (the 13 story mega mosque to be built a few blocks from Ground Zero); he believed that it was a slap in the face but un-Constitutional to block due to the freedom of speech and religion tenets of the Constitution. Even though Beck does not state that he agrees that the mosque is a victory statement by radical islamists, he does follow the breadcrumb trail proving that the mosque probably should not be built starting with Feisal Abdul Rauf – the imam behind the mosque. I am sure he obtained massive amounts of research from Pam Geller of Atlas Shrugs and Stop Islamization Of America; the biggest proponent of blocking this mosque who is behind yet another protest against this obamanation (oops) abomination on September 11th, 2010.
Here is the breadcrumb trail starting with Imam Rauf who is a key figure in the Perdana Global Peace Org. who is the largest contributor ($366,000) to Free Gaza who sponsored the 6 ship flotilla that attacked Israel recently who is also being helped by Hamas supported groups. Free Gaza is also supported by terrorists Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn who are close buddies of Obama who is also close to Rashid Khalidi who is currently planning a second flotilla to be launched soon that will be called “Audacity of Hope” (Obama’s second book and Jeremiah Wright’s speech). Glenn also speaks to how Elena Kagan (globalist lawyer) and Hillary Clinton are tied to this circle. The State Department’s involvement comes from funding a trip for Imam Rauf (at the taxpayer’s expense) to the Middle East under the pretense of muslim outreach when in all actuality it may be a way for Rauf to raise $100 Million to build Cordoba House, the jihadists’ victory symbol on conquered land.
“This is no way to treat the people of Arizona,” said Governor Brewer. “To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the Secretary of State is just outrageous. If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation.” –
Gov. Jan Brewer
But Governor; we are all world citizens now, aren’t we? Border are lies according to the left, correct?
Back to the news…
Gov. Brewer learned of the lawsuit that Obama is going to bring against the State of Arizona during an interview that Hillary Clinton gave to Ecuadorean NTN24 on June 8th. The governor’s response to the lawsuit follows with a link to the pdf (H/T KG and TheRightScoop).
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Paul Senseman June 17, 2010 (602) 542-1342 firstname.lastname@example.org
PHOENIX – Governor Jan Brewer said she was stunned and angered to learn during an Ecuadorean television interview with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the Obama Administration had decided to sue Arizona over its recently passed anti-illegal immigration law, SB1070. Video of the interview can be seen at Governor Brewer’s Arizona Border Security Information website:www.azgovernor.gov/AZBorderSecurity.asp
Secretary Clinton announced during the interview on June 8th that President Obama has directed the U.S. Justice Department to “bring a lawsuit against the Arizona law.” “This is no way to treat the people of Arizona,” said Governor Brewer. “To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the Secretary of State is just outrageous. If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation.” Governor Brewer said, “I just visited with the President in the Oval Office about our differences over immigration policy, and the one firm understanding we had was that within two weeks he would provide details of his commitment to deploy National Guard troops to the border. While I am grateful that communications have taken place about a possible visit by Administration staff before the end of the month, there is not yet a confirmed date. More importantly, no information about additional troop and border security enhancements has been provided by the Obama Administration to the citizens of Arizona.”
Governor Brewer recently announced the creation of a legal defense fund for private contributions in defense of Arizona’s illegal immigration enforcement measures – www.keepazsafe.com. Over $22,000 in contributions have been made to the border legal defense fund since its announcement yesterday evening. Over $26,000 had previously been sent unsolicited to the Governor for legal defense of Arizona, for an approximate total of $48,000 in the fund. ###
UPDATE: Reason.TV has a response for Hillary Clinton.
Many moderate voters, myself included, did not realize that Hillary Clinton was a stealth progressive until a few months before the presidential election. At least now, unless you still have the democrat kool-aid IV in, most know an Alinsky acolyte when they see one.
(It always amazes me that the progressives will make statements to like minded individuals that are so clearly in direct conflict with the Constitution even though they know cameras are rolling. Remember Barry speaking to fellow socialists in San Fran about energy costs necessarily rising?)
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a rare foray into domestic politics today, offering her view that — given America’s high unemployment — wealthy Americans don’t pay enough taxes.
“The rich are not paying their fair share in any nation that is facing the kind of employment issues [America currently does] — whether it’s individual, corporate or whatever [form of] taxation forms,” Clinton told an audience at the Brookings Institution, where she was discussing the Administration’s new National Security Strategy.
Clinton said the comment was her personal opinion alone. “I’m not speaking for the administration, so I’ll preface that with a very clear caveat,” she said.
Clinton went on to cite Brazil as a model.
“Brazil has the highest tax-to-GDP rate in the Western Hemisphere and guess what — they’re growing like crazy,” Clinton said. “And the rich are getting richer, but they’re pulling people out of poverty.”
I have a sneaking suspicion that there is more to the equation than high taxes equals wealth. Personally, I sticking with the Laffer Curve, and the Constitution that states that the government is not allowed to tax labor.
For those that still don’t know about Hillary Clinton, go here.
It’s amusement time! Oh there are so many things I could say right about now, but I think I will just let you take a moment to listen to Mark Penn talk about the democrats, the republicans, the tea parties, and Sarah Palin. He has actually figured out that the “party of no party” is currently the biggest voting demographic .
Mr. Penn’s ‘genius’ moment was receiving $6 Million of stimulus money to save 3 jobs at a firm lead by him:
The call for an audit came as news broke that a public relations firm headed by Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign strategist, received nearly $6 million in stimulus funds to save three jobs — a report Penn’s company called “fundamentally inaccurate.”
“I cannot fathom how Hillary Clinton’s pollster received $6 million to preserve just three jobs when that could sustain dozens of South Carolina’s families for life,” Wilson said.
A contract worth nearly $6 million in stimulus funds was awarded by the Obama adminstration to two firms run by Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s pollster in 2008.
Federal records show that a contract worth $5.97 million, part of the $787 billion stimulus Congress passed this year, helped preserve three jobs at Burson-Marsteller, the global public-relations and communications firm headed by Penn.
Burson-Marsteller won the contract to work on a public-relations campaign to advertise the national switch from analog to digital television. Nearly $2.8 million of the contract was awarded through a subcontract to Penn’s polling firm, Penn, Schoen & Berland, according to federal records.
Federal records also show that a former adviser to President Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign received nearly $70,000 from that contract to help alert viewers in difficult-to-reach communities that their televisions would ssoon no longer receive broadcast signals.