(Editor’s Note: Look For Update At End Of This Post, 11.11.2011)
A NATION OF SHEEP BEGETS A GOVERNMENT OF WOLVES
(Editor’s Note: For those readers who believe that Ron Paul’s ideas are crazy and fringe, that there are only a few thousand devotees ‘slamming polls’, that Dr. Paul can’t trounce Obama, that there isn’t a way to stop the global Borg movement, that there isn’t a way back to Constitutional principles and that the Cain, Romney or Gingrich are going to make everything better; put down the koolaid and stop letting the Media decide your candidate for you. YOU WILL GET MORE OF THE SAME. Now is the time; there are enough Americans awake now to make the shift. Open your ears, open your minds, and THINK! P.S. – To my readers – I’m all in.)
Twice now (here and here), Bill O’Reilly has disqualified Ron Paul from a poll because his message was connecting with American voters, Fox pulled a debate poll for the same reason, and now CNBC wants YOU to believe that Ron Paul supporters have some magical way of getting around the IP gateway to overload a poll. There are two logical reasons why Ron Paul does so well in the polls.
Ron Paul supporters get off the couch, go to their computers, and VOTE!
Ron Paul’s message resonates with Americans thinking about voting for someone else , they get off the couch, go to their computers, and VOTE!
Ron Paul has won 15 straw polls….have you heard that? You won’t hear that because they want you to believe that you are alone so that you will vote for the best marketed GOP candidate who mimics everything that Ron Paul says. What happens when Dr. Paul wins the Iowa Primary? How they going to spin that? (more…)
WTF? I’m not sure how the rest of America feels about this debate, but I personally am sick to death of people like (closet moonbat) Bill O’Reilly linking ‘enhanced interrogation’ (come on Bill, you can say torture) with results. There IS NO debate. Americans need to get their heads in the game properly and start asking the right questions. Since WHEN has it been A-okay for America to torture people? End the question right there! Does this thinking and behavior not fall under the insane, communist Saul Alinsky philosophy that states ‘the ends justify the means‘. Take a moment and really ask yourself, “Has my moral compass been compromised by societal norms?”
Bill O’Reilly, in his talking points memo, blasts taxpayer funded NPR for the firing of Juan Williams stating that Mr. Williams was fired because of his association with FoxNews, that former NY Times employee and NPR CEO, Vivian Schiller should be fired for incompetence, that Sen. Jim Demint will be introducing legislation to defund NPR, and that George Soros has infused millions in cash to Media Matter and NPR (to hire political journalists) to attack FoxNews. Mr. O’Reilly believes that NPR will ‘rue the day’ they decided to impose rules on free speech, and that NPR has ‘devolved into a totalitarian outfit functioning as an arm of the far left.‘ (Wow, Bill, you just figured that out? Actions speak louder than words, and yes, us little people have to slap you silly sometimes; we’ve known for over two years now.)
I personally believe that now that the progressives have the prize in their sights, they are going to go whole-hog to achieves their ends. I say, “Bring It” because FoxNews is NOT the only alternative news platform and ‘net neutrality’ does not scare us.
Yesterday, Bill O’Reilly interviewed Mark Potok of the Southern Law Poverty Center who made comments about how fearful he was of the Oathkeepers (see here).
Today, O’Reilly interviewed Stewart Rhodes, founder of the Oathkeepers. It appears that Bill thinks it is perfectly reasonable to suspend the 2nd amendment given a state of emergency, and that the Oathkeepers’ stance is ‘extreme’. I believe that if our government officials were not so blatantly corrupt and such bald faced liars, we would not need people like the Oathkeepers. Does Bill O’Reilly really believe that given a state of emergency, average Americans are going to go out in the streets and shoot it up? He has such a high opinion of us. Who among us believes that our 2nd amendment rights are not under attack and will not continue to be under attack from a government that many of us can no longer trust?
LM has been covering the unsustainable debt that previous and current congresses have saddled us with for many months now. Recently I posted an op-ed pieced penned by Stewart Dougherty (Tea Party Patriots Vs. The Master Class) detailing how the elites are turning all of us and future generations into indentured servants to our government, and China by extension of our debt.
Last week, on 1.28.09; I saw an interview of Steven Moore with Greta Van Susteren for “On The Record” where Mr. Moore made the comment that China now owns more of our debt than the American public does. I have been searching for video tape or a transcript of that interview to post because if I heard Mr. Moore correctly, it begs this question. “Did our Congress, by raising the debt ceiling again, just commit treason by circumventing our national security with an unsustainable debt to China? What happens when China increases the interest rates? Something to think about….
Glenn gets started with the infamous debt clock and what mortgage and credit card debt decreasing actually means (hint: it’s not good).
He then delves into the very issue of the elites and our debt to China with news that this administration “has lowered the priority placed on intelligence collection for China”, even though they appear to be hacking us daily.
The White House National Security Council recently directed U.S. spy agencies to lower the priority placed on intelligence collection for China, amid opposition to the policy change from senior intelligence leaders who feared it would hamper efforts to obtain secrets about Beijing’s military and its cyber-attacks.
The downgrading of intelligence gathering on China was challenged by Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair and CIA Director Leon E. Panetta after it was first proposed in interagency memorandums in October, current and former intelligence officials said.
Part 2, Why didn’t George Bush go after China when lead based paint was found in toys, or poisoned dog food was sold in America? Why did the Obama administration lower the intelligence collection priority on China?:
My readers know that I think that Bill O’Reilly is a closet leg tingler going way back, that he drives me freakin’ crazy, and today, I almost threw something at the TV again during his talking points because of this comment:
To say that a tea party or a bull moose party or whatever should not be established because it would help a sitting liberal president is anti-democratic. We need more choices in America because the same old, same old is not working. So three cheers for three parties. Whatever the new party is called, it can’t do any worse than the old parties, can it?