AYFKM? Our tax payer money for this? Florida; can you do something about this? Focus on healthcare, deficits, over-blown government spending? Nope – Haiti, Pat Robertson, and republicans’ ‘pact with the devil’.
Just for contrast, a breath of fresh air, and because I know my readers enjoy this gentleman’s speaking style as much as I do; Daniel Hannan. Can we draft this fellow?
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer believes that the senate health care bill is better than nothing, and even if Scott Brown takes Dead Kennedy’s seat away from the democrats, the progressives will be able to pass a bill before he is certified.
What part of ‘We Do Not Want Government Healthcare’ are they not understanding? What part of “We Want Healthcare Reform; Start Over!” are they not getting? Rest assured America, they hear us and are totally ignoring our voices.
The progressives want to put America on a very tight leash by controlling every aspect of our behavior through health care, and they wonder why Scott Brown is kicking Martha Coakley’s tush? Steny Hoyer’s comments are symptomatic of the dems’ thought processes.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) on Tuesday said passing the Senate healthcare bill would be “clearly better than nothing.”
This statement only makes sense when one looks at the true motivations of the Progressive Socialist Democratic Party. It has never been about health care; it’s always been about telling us what is good for us because we are just open-mouthed breathing idiots. America, are you offended and insulted by what the Progressives (both dem and pub) have been doing? They are not going to stop because they, ‘as our parents’, know better than we do.
Hoyer dodged questions about how Democrats would go forward without a 60th vote in the Senate, saying he did not want to “anticipate or speculate or hypothesize” on the outcome of the Massachusetts race. But he admitted that rushing a finished product through both chambers before Brown could be sworn in was a possibility. (emphasis mine)
Asked if it was “feasible” to pass a healthcare bill in next 15 days, prior to the Massachusetts election certification, Hoyer said, “Yes.”
If Coakley pulls this out, I cannot wait to see how many dead people voted for Martha, and whether or not the Black Panthers were outside polling centers with nightsticks ‘ala Pennsylvania, November 2008.
The Dems are not going to stop to even think about what their actions are doing to the country, and I for one, am thankful that they are so rabidly turning a blind eye to the opposition. The race to flip the country to a European Socialist State is going to reverberate for decades, and the Democratic Party may not survive their assault on Americans and the Constitution.
Florida Congressman Alan Grayson telling YOU how it’s going to be:
…non-rep Grayson (D-FL) for stating that the republican health care plan is for you to die quickly if you get sick.
Non-rep. Grayson’s comment could be considered a lie, except he probably has not read H.R. 3438 introduced by Darrell Issa, R-CA which allows Americans access to the federal employees’ health care package. Hit the link, read it, and then email it to dipstick Grayson. You may want to email it to your friends and family also.
The second Today’s AYFKM? Award goes to Science Czar John Holdren for espousing a strong enough belief that he put it into a college textbook he co-authored stating that the government should seize babies born to unwed mothers and put them up for adoption (among other brilliant ideas).
Proposed government force adoption if mother refused to get abortion
Obama science czar John Holdren stated in a college textbook
that “illegitimate children” born to unwed mothers could be taken by the government and put up for adoption if the mother refused to have an abortion.
Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, argued that “illegitimate childbearing could be strongly discouraged” as a socioeconomic measure imposed to control population growth.
As previously reported, WND has obtained a copy of the 1970s college textbook “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” that Ehrlich co-authored with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich’s wife, Anne. The authors argued involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by “climate change.”
On page 786, the authors wrote that one way to discourage illegitimate childbearing “might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption – especially those born to minors who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone.”
Alternatively, the authors suggested unwed mothers might place their babies up for adoption, writing: “If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it.”
While observing that government-imposed coercive measures should be considered “only if milder measures fail completely,” the authors acknowledged extreme ecological situations could justify governmental intervention with coercive population control measures,
“It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society,” they write.
“Some people – respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included – have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right,” the authors continued on page 838. “Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce.”
In a similar fashion, the authors argued that a right to privacy did not extend to an unlimited right to have children, elaborating on page 838 that, “Where the society has a ‘compelling, subordinating interest’ in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society’s survival depended on having more children, women could be required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted.”
Go over and read the rest and if you are not already saying Are You Freakin’ Kidding Me? you will be. Un-frakkin-believable! I wouldn’t want this guy anywhere near my dirty laundry, let alone DC or the White House.
Representative Alan Grayson is OUT OF HIS MIND just like the rest of the non-representative representatives who need to just go home because their services are NO LONGER REQUIRED when they put this kind of fascist manure out on display. Limiting the pay of any private sector employee is so far beyond the pale that I KNOW the Founding Fathers are just itching for a chance to bitch-slap idiots like Alan Grayson right into their next lives. Anbody want to play “Slippery Slope”? THIS is exactly the reason why government and private sector business are not supposed to mix! Those companies should have been allowed to fail and stop the bleeding of the nation, except now we know why they were not allowed to fail. I have to stop ranting; Neil does a fine job of skewering open-mouth breathing, dipstick Grayson.
For those of you that do not know about H.R.1664, go here.
Let’s move on to the next “Democrats Gone Wild” sideshow; H.R. 1444 which I wrote about last week which addresses spending our money with the purpose of Congress setting up a commission to study the feasibility of mandatory service for young people. Why are we allowing them to spend our money on Hitler Youth 2.0 under the guise of patriotism and selflessness. How about Field Of Dreams, “Build it and they will come” instead. Make the programs available and people will sign up instead of coming for our children for indoctrination into the National Civilian Army.
Ladies and Gentlemen: it is time to end the fascist dictatorship of the 546 people running this country right now. You and I could do a better job!