I know I am probably going to piss off quite a few readers because I just will not let this subject go; but this blog has always been about exploring all the stories, checking the evidence, and being open-minded. I have already been labeled a conspiracy theorist, and I personally find that a bit offensive because I am presenting information I find for the reader’s perusal. I think I have only gotten on my soapbox once about the Pilgrims.
I have always had my theories about 9/11, and have not shared them other than to say that the official report does not make any sense. The evidence, gathered by scientists worldwide, that continues to surface points to something completely different than said report; and that goes for the Pentagon and WTC 7. I realized that something was greatly amiss when fighter jets were not scrambled immediately after the first plane went off course.
H/T to Michelle for sending this French documentary along. I believe you will be mesmerized by the evidence imparted and by the everyday people you will hear testimony from, (not to mention the scientists, pilots, air traffic controllers, firemen, businessmen, and the military).
If afterward, the perfect angle cuts on the struts of the twin towers, and the lack of debris at the Pentagon, (among other things), does not encourage you to consider that maybe the Bush administration had something to do with this so that they could pull us into Afghanistan and Iraq, and curtail our civil liberties with another bill they did not read, The Patriot Act, then I don’t know what will. One more thing; can someone tell me what happened to American Airlines Flight 77?
In keeping with never letting a good crisis go to waste, the theory that the government allowed Al Qaeda to attack us isn’t too far a stretch when considering what Richard Gage has to say about 7 WTC. Our government’s involvement in 9/11 revolves around Building 7, and if Richard Gage’s theory proves correct, it will take us to some even darker places than we have been before, (but not totally unexpected).
700 Architects and engineers are calling for a new investigation of 9/11 and “Building 7” because of the controlled demolition, and evidence thereof, of this building.
My readers know that I am currently researching a massive rabbit hole, but am going to take some time to follow up on what exactly Building 7 is all about, and given who the tenants of building 7 were, it will probably be very interesting. I have emphasised the tenants of note that I will be investigating.
The position of Building 7 in relation to the other WTC buildings before September 11, 2001
In June 1986, before construction was completed, Silverstein signed Drexel Burnham Lambert as a tenant to lease the entire 7 World Trade Center building for $3 billion over a term of 30 years.[19] In December 1986, after the Boesky insider-trading scandal, Drexel Burnham Lambert canceled the lease, leaving Silverstein to find other tenants.[20] Spicer & Oppenheim agreed to lease 14 percent of the space, but for more than a year, as Black Monday and other factors adversely affected the Lower Manhattan real estate market, Silverstein was unable to find tenants for the remaining space. By April 1988, Silverstein had lowered the rent and made other concessions.[21]
In November 1988, Salomon Brothers withdrew from plans to build a large new complex at Columbus Circle in Midtown and agreed to a 20-year lease for the top 19 floors of 7 World Trade Center.[22]The building was extensively renovated in 1989 to accommodate the needs of Salomon Brothers.[23] Most of three existing floors were removed as tenants continued to occupy other floors, and more than 350 tons (U.S.) of steel were added to construct three double-height trading floors. Nine diesel generators were installed on the 5th floor as part of a backup power station. “Essentially, Salomon is constructing a building within a building – and it’s an occupied building, which complicates the situation,” said a district manager of Silverstein Properties. The unusual task was possible, said Larry Silverstein, because it was designed to allow for “entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building’s structural integrity, on the assumption that someone might need double-height floors.”[23]
At the time of the September 11, 2001 attacks, Salomon Smith Barney was by far the largest tenant in 7 World Trade Center, occupying 1,202,900 sq ft (111,750 m²) (64 percent of the building) which included floors 28–45.[6][24] Other major tenants included ITT Hartford Insurance Group (122,590 sq ft/11,400 m²), American Express Bank International (106,117 sq ft/9,900 m²), Standard Chartered Bank, Securities and Exchange Commission (111,398 sq ft/10,350 m²), and the (106,117 sq ft/9,850 m²).[24] Smaller tenants included the Internal Revenue Service Regional Council (90,430 sq ft/8,400 m²) and the United States Secret Service (85,343 sq ft/7,900 m²).[24] The smallest tenants included the New York City Office of Emergency Management,[25]National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Federal Home Loan Bank, First State Management Group Inc., Provident Financial Management, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service.[24] The Department of Defense (DOD) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) shared the 25th floor with the IRS.[6] Floors 46–47 were mechanical floors, as were the bottom six floors and part of the seventh floor.[6][26]
We all see the same names coming up over and over again, yet you may wonder why the DOD and CIA were left out. As always; following the money…
