What Part Of ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ DO THEY NOT GET?????

What Part Of ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ DO THEY NOT GET?????

Infringement

 

The 2nd Amendment:

As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

INFRINGE (from Merriam-Webster):

to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent>

Pretty simple, yes?  In fact, so cleanly written by the founders that it would likely be impossible that a five year would not understand it.  Yet…..there are millions of globalist tools out there that believe that background checks, registration, confiscation, and banning guns would stop violence.  Alas, that isn’t the point of this post.  What these assclowns do not get (even though we keep banging our heads against the wall in an effort to educmacate them) is that it does not matter what they think about the Second Amendment and gun violence; what matters is that this amendment is in place to STOP TYRANNY like the kind we have been experience for a couple decades now.  The founders of this great nation knew that if power became centrally located (like we are experiencing currently with the District of Criminals), we would lose our GOD-GIVEN rights, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and our lives.  What is even sadder is that the first idiots marched off are going to be these tools of the globalists once their usefulness has come to an end.  The founders wanted to make this amendment and it’s purpose so simple that no one would even think to fiddle around with it.  Welcome to the brainwashed progressive agenda that does not want Americans to know about the legacy of collectivism.

In an effort to possibly get through to some of our brainwashed fellow Americans, I am posting a video from Publius Huldah on why every single law that has been passed INFRINGING ON THE 2ND AMENDMENT is un-Constitutional and therefore, null and void.  If you think I will be registering any of my firearms and/or handing them over to the government willingly, you are sadly mistaken.

Nunc Pro Tunc: The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings (James Wesley Rawles)

This is a standing invitation to my fellow Americans: If congress ever enacts a law mandating the registration and/or a production ban of detachable magazine semiautomatic rifles then you are hereby invited to the town square of your local community. There, burn barrels will be set up and we will publicly burn Form 4473s, FFL Bound Books, state and local registration records, and the sales receipts for every firearm in the United States. On that same day, FFL holders and public officials holding electronic firearms records will simultaneously erase those records, permanently and irretrievably. (Using special file erasure software such as Blancco, X-Ways, and Stellar Wipe, or though the physical destruction of disk drives.)

Spontaneous Gatherings, Spontaneous Combustion

This burn barrel day–likely to be held the day after the President signs any new draconian legislation–will include speeches, public prayers, and the blessing of those who have gathered by ministers, rabbis, and priests.

The core of the activities on that day will be stalwart public defiance of any new unconstitutional law(s), the open and notorious destruction of records that might be used to enslave us, and vocal public affirmations of solidarity of free men and women, in the face of tyranny. This will be a defining moment for America–a line drawn in the sand. We will forthrightly declare that we will not obey any unconstitutional law and that we will treat it dismissively, as if it had never been enacted — nunc pro tunc. We will pledge ourselves to the defense of liberty, both individually and collectively. We will vow that if ever called to jury duty, we will nullify any unconstitutional laws, vacating the charges against the accused, in accordance with our long-standing right as jurors. (See: www.FIJA.org.)

The Law is On Our Side

We will publicly re-affirm some long standing precepts of American jurisprudence, to wit:

§ 195 Generally

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law(1) but is wholly void(2) and ineffective for any purpose.(3) Since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it,(4) an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed(5) and never existed;(6) that is, it is void ab initio.(7) Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.(8)

Since an unconstitutional law is void, it follows that generally the statute imposes no duties,(9) confers no rights,(10) creates no office(11) or liabilities,(12) bestows no power or authority on anyone,(13) affords no protection,(14) is incapable of creating any rights or obligations,(15) does not allow for the granting of any relief,(16) and justifies no acts performed under it.(17)

Once a statute is determined to be unconstitutional, no private citizen or division of the state may take any further action pursuant to its provisions.(18) A contract that rests on an unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation.(19) No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law,(20) and no courts are bound to enforce it.(21) A law contrary to the United States Constitution may not be enforced.(22) Once a statute has been declared unconstitutional, courts thereafter have no jurisdiction over alleged violations.(23) Persons convicted and fined under a statute subsequently held unconstitutional may recover the fines paid.(24)

 JeffersonGunBan

NRA Commentator And Navy Seal Dom Raso On Personal Protection

NRA Commentator And Navy Seal Dom Raso On Personal Protection

Dom Raso, a former Navy Seal has become a commentator for the NRA and puts forward yet another compelling argument against gun control legislation; namely, when SHTF, who is in the middle of it? The police, the politicians, or you? He also points out that now that he is a civilian, he is no longer considered responsible enough to use a firearm by politicians and military brass pushing gun control.

The Virtual President’s State Of The Union; ‘Gun Control’

The Virtual President’s State Of The Union; ‘Gun Control’

Monster readers may or may not be familiar with Bill Whittle and his continuing role as the ‘Virtual President’ attempting to ‘introduce some common sense into modern American politics’.  I have posted his press conference on what should be coming out of the White House concerning North Korea’s aggressive stance on the front page.  It’s well worth taking a few minutes to watch. The following is a 7 minute clip from his 2013 State of the Union Address concerning gun control legislation, un-Constitutional actions coming out of congress, and treason.  It is logical, reasonable, and one of the most convincing speeches about guns, violence, and the arrogance shown by the political elites that I have seen in a very long time.  Please feel free to send it on…

Therefore, I am directing the virtual attorney general to aggressively challenge any gun control laws that violate Amanda Collins’ right not to be raped and Brianna Dennison’s right not to be murdered. – Virtual President, SOTU 2013

GUNS (Virtual State of the Union 2013)

Gun Control Legislation; Yet Another Exercise In Insanity

Gun Control Legislation; Yet Another Exercise In Insanity

“The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” – Unknown

Harry Reid has placed S649: Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013 on the Senate calender for this Thursday and it appears the usual GOP suspects (with the surprising exception of Tom Coburn; what the hell was he thinking?) are lined up to allow debate.

Yes, boys and girls, the insanity of T.A.R.P., the Stimulus Package, Obamacare, FISA, NDAA, the Patriot Act, and Debt Ceiling increases is about to happen yet again, and the GOP will AGAIN (shock, dismay!) go right along with the dems and then cry foul after the fact.  Does the GOP really believe that playing nice with the Dems is going to go any differently this time or are they just lying to us again?  I’ll take door #2 Monty!

Now prepare yourselves for the next stage of the scenario; the yelling, screaming, and faxing; only to have another liberty and freedom destroying 1500 or 2000 page monstrosity shoved down our throats, where you can then take it to the Supreme Court and be told that yet another law infringing on the 2nd amendment is completely Constitutional (just like the federal government controlled and implemented Obamacare).  If it wasn’t so late in the day, the whole dance would actually be comical.  Unfortunately, Rome is completely engulfed in flames (as we pour trillions of fiat dollars into the banks) and they are opening the door to removing all fire extinguishers from any and all homes.

Hele Mai!!!

From AP:

Senate showdown vote on gun curbs set for Thursday

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate’s top Democrat has set Congress’ first showdown vote for Thursday on President Barack Obama’s gun control drive as a small but mounting number of Republicans appear willing to buck a conservative effort to prevent debate from even beginning.

*break*

Reid said he did not know if he had the 60 votes he will need to defeat the conservatives’ roadblock. But at least eight Republicans have said they want to begin debate or have indicated a willingness to consider it: Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Susan Collins of Maine, Roy Blunt of Missouri and Mark Kirk of Illinois.

*break*

In a written statement, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said conservatives want to prevent Obama from rushing the legislation through Congress “because he knows that as Americans begin to find out what is in the bill, they will oppose it.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has said he will join the conservatives’ attempt to block debate.

The bill would expand required federal background checks to nearly all gun transactions — a provision Reid would try to replace with the completed agreement between Manchin and Toomey. It would also stiffen penalties for illegal firearms trafficking and provide a small boost in school safety aid.

 

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 2242 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: