The Deep State’s Regime Change Against America Is Almost Complete (And It’s Going To Fail)

The Deep State’s Regime Change Against America Is Almost Complete (And It’s Going To Fail)

The Deep State’s ‘color revolution’ against America and her champion, President Trump, is almost complete. The dividing lines in America could not be any more clear, nor any more solid. I cannot state loudly enough how much danger our Constitutional Republic is in at this very moment.

The only people keeping America from being turned into a vassal state of the Chinese Communist Party with all of their brutal, totalitarian measures is Donald J. Trump and the 80 million people that voted for him and KNOW this election was stolen even though the media has gas-lighted the entire world and buried the truth.

Feeble Joe Biden DID NOT get more votes than Barack Obama, and everybody in the world knows it.

On the other side we have the Satanic Globalists, their retainers, the Democrat Party, RINO Republicans that want the gravy train to keep flowing and their crimes to stay hidden, Big Tech, Big Corp, Big Media, and complacent brain-dead Americans that think 45 is the boogeyman and Europe’s way of life is fantastic.

There is an actual war going on right underneath the surface and most Americans do not realize it. WE.MUST.WAKE.THEM.UP.

The ‘attack’ on the U.S. Capitol was a false flag engineered with the globalist fingerprint of multiple benefits. Trump supporters are made to look like goons and criminals, the Republicans backed down from their objections to fraudulent electoral votes, the topic of election fraud disappears, the certification process happens in the middle of the night like every other nasty piece of business, and President Trump is pilloried as an instigator of ‘armed insurrection’ with Nan calling for his removal from office 14 days before the end of his first term. What’s the rush Nan? (I think I know why, but we’ll get to that later).

On Wednesday, I watched 12 live, side by side, video feeds on DLive as the protestors entered the building, and I could pick out the black clad Antifa members as they broke windows, doors, and generally disrespected our seat of government. Not only can they not help themselves, they really don’t care because someone is going to bail them out the very next day.

For anybody doubting that the activist arm of the Democrat party wasn’t on full display, go here, here or here where law enforcement led the rioters.

This is Antifa (with backpack) playing Parcour
These are Trump protestors staying inside the ropes.
Notice man stitting on floor wearing what appears to be a ‘F*** Trump’ shirt.

My focus today is to give you a brief post to help explain to your fellow countrymen that are just starting to wake up from their normalcy bias what happened and why. The globalists are trying to reset the world and they cannot do it with America strong and properous; 45 has to go and his supporters must be demoralized.


COLOR REVOLUTION AKA REGIME CHANGE

I am sure you have heard the term ‘color revolution’ before, but may still be wondering exactly what it is. Color revolutions are what the globalist led CIA have been doing in foreign countries to effect regime change (in our names). I’m going to borrow from Revolver.news because they already did the heavy lifting, and we don’t have alot of time right now.

A “Color Revolution” in this context refers to a specific type of coordinated attack that the United States government has been known to deploy against foreign regimes, particularly in Eastern Europe deemed to be “authoritarian” and hostile to American interests. Rather than using a direct military intervention to effect regime change as in Iraq, Color Revolutions attack a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, organizing mass protests and acts of civil disobedience, and leveraging media contacts to ensure favorable coverage to their agenda in the Western press. [Revolver]

Recognize any of these?

A drilldown:

Color Revolutions attack a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, (According to the left and anti-Trumpers, President Trump’s historic 2016 win against Hillary Clinton only happened with the help of Russia’s intervention which lead to investigations and ultimately a failed impeachment all in an attempt to remove him from office.)

organizing mass protests and acts of civil disobedience, (The #Resistance movement since before President Trump was inaugurated, and the burning and looting of large American cities using several different catalysts. Once again, an imcompetent president that needs to be removed from office using the 25th Amendment.)

and leveraging media contacts to ensure favorable coverage to their agenda in the Western press. (The purge of all conservative voices on many of the main stream platforms and the rabid narrative being carried by every single main stream outlet.)

Color revolutions started with a man named Gene Sharpe, and a booklet he wrote called ‘From Dictatorship To Democracy’. It was turned on it’s head by George Kent:

But once one takes a look at what George Kent’s job actually is at the State Department, the story becomes far more suggestive—even explosive. Kent just happens to be Deputy Assistant Secretary in the European and Eurasian Bureau. This bureau is generally known as the State Department hub for so-called “Color Revolutions,” through which the State Department, together with covert agencies and a constellation of allied NGOs influence, and at times overturn, elections in foreign countries. Indeed, one former senior state department official has told Revolver News that Kent is a “color revolution expert” — a designation that has been corroborated to Revolver by two current senior State Department sources.

Prior to his current role, Kent served as Deputy Chief of Mission in Kyiv, Ukraine (2015-18), working directly under the ousted star-impeachment witness Ambassador Yovanovitch. Prior to this, Kent was working as a “deputy political counselor” in Ukraine during the infamous “Orange Revolution” — arguably the most famous of the State Department and NGO-facilitated “Color Revolutions.” In essence, the Orange Revolution refers to a continuous barrage of protests, mass demonstrations, and other acts of civil disobedience in Ukraine in response to the contested election of Russia aligned Viktor Yanukovych, who defeated the Western-backed Viktor Yushchenko.

and Norm Eisen’s ‘The Playbook’.

Norm Eisen’s ‘The Playbook’

And then we have the ‘7 Pillars of a Color Revolution’ from The Blaze:

The former ambassador to Russia under the Obama Administration, Michael McFaul, came up with “7 Pillars of Color Revolution,” a list of seven steps needed to incite the type of revolution used to upend Eastern European countries like Ukraine and Georgia in the past two decades. On his TV special this week, Glenn Beck broke down the seven steps and showed how they’re happening right now in America.

Here are McFaul’s seven steps:

1. Semi-autocratic regime (not fully autocratic) – provides opportunity to call incumbent leader “fascist”

2. Appearance of unpopular president or incumbent leader

3. United and organized opposition – Antifa, BLM

4. Effective system to convince the public (well before the election) of voter fraud

5. Compliant media to push voter fraud narrative

6. Political opposition organization able to mobilize “thousands to millions in the streets”

7. Division among military and police

ENDGAME

We have gone through enough of the steps to realize that the globalists and their minions have been perpetrating a color revolution against America and it is almost complete save one feature; 45 is still in place for 12 more days and America’s enemies cannot allow that. President Donald Trump is in control of the greatest military in the world and Nan can’t find enough vodka or ice cream to keep her masters’ shrieking at bay, (and you know exactly what I mean).

Pelosi is a rabid, ghoul falling into alcoholic senility, but as a faithful and fearful, globalist monkey, she is being driven to never let a planned crisis go to waste (Covid-19, U.S. capitol attack, etc), as evidenced by her ridiculous statement on Thursday, January 7, 2021.

NANCY PELOSI: The president of the United States incited an armed insurrection against America. The gleeful desecration of the US Capitol, which is the temple of our American democracy, and the violence targeting Congress, are horrors that will forever stain our nation’s history, instigated by the President of the United States. That’s why it’s such a stain.

A little critical thought needs to be interjected. “Incited an armed insurrection against America.” Nan is saying this about the leader of the free world and the Commander-In-Chief of the United States Military. I also only saw guns in the hands of “security” and Capitol Police. Armed with what? Flags? But of course none of that matters to Nancy’s regime change narrative. She knows her brain-dead constituents will think 45 tried to attack Congress to force an election vote in his favor.

She continues:

In calling for this seditious act, the president has committed an unspeakable assault on our nation and our people. I join the Senate Democratic leader in calling on the vice president to remove this president by immediately invoking the 25th Amendment. If the vice president and Cabinet do not act, the Congress may be prepared to move forward with impeachment. That is the overwhelming sentiment of my caucus.

There it is again; that phrase, ‘remove this president’. The goal is to remove 45 from power by any means necessary. This long ago became an issue of war, not politics. These traitors are going to hang and they all know it. Everything they have done and said for the last 2 days reeks of desperation and panic.

As I write this post, this tweet is circulating:

Yesterday, 1.8.2021, President Trump and MILLIONS of conservatives were deplatformed across the web (yours truly was included in the purge). I was suspended from Twitter with no notice for “platform manipulation and spamming”.

Here is the reason I was suspended. An interview with Maria Zack who has evidence that Barack Obama and the former Italian Prime Minister are behind the 2020 election theft and vote switching using $400 Million of our dollars and an italian satellite.

Maria Zack: ITALIAN JOB & America’s Elections | ACWT Interview 1.6.21


American is at war with the globalists who are hiding behind the dems, the media, big tech, and big corporations. The very last line of defense for humanity is AMERICA and they are doing their damnedest to kill her.

It appears they stole our elections in 2012, they attempted to steal 2016 but were taken by surprise, they ‘took’ control of the House in 2018, they stole 2020 and they did it again with the Georgia Senate races. So, House, White House, Senate. The trifecta of control. Checkmate but for one man.

In my opinion, they false flagged the Capitol, they deplatformed the President and millions of patriots in an attempt to break the lines of communication to demoralize 45 and us. Amazon is about to kick Parler off their servers because they got too big and too popular too fast, and they are a patriotic American company; not a multi-national conglomerate.

We are at war and America needs to wake up. Almost everybody is locked down because of virus that originated in China, small businesses are being destroyed, and Americans are suffering while they send all our money overseas to be laundered back into their pockets. If they are able to install their zombie president, the radical left will impose CCP levels of control on the population and then we will see bloodshed.

Personally, I believe the 2020 elections were a sting operation to show who the traitors are, and Nancy is screeching because she knows they got caught and they are frantically trying any means necessary to stop the pain that’s coming…

The future belongs to a new America First Party because both parties have shown their true globalist colors.

America First Party

UPDATE – Late 1.9.21

This image speaks for itself:

Steve Pieczenik Interview With Alex Jones On An Iranian Attack, 10.13.2011

Steve Pieczenik Interview With Alex Jones On An Iranian Attack, 10.13.2011

Alex Jones interviews Steve Pieczenik about the ‘false flag’ terrorist threat against the Saudi ambassador by Iran giving the United States and Israel cover for an attack on Iran. “The intel I’ve got is a strike on Iran by Israel within two weeks, The U.S. then responding when Iran totally shuts down the oil supply.” (Alex Jones) (more…)

Look For The Coverup And See The Lie: Eliminating The Natural Born Clause

Look For The Coverup And See The Lie: Eliminating The Natural Born Clause

Follow the cover-up and find the lie.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. – Article II, Section 1, Clause 5

It was obvious to many Americans that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro could NOT be constitutionally eligible to even RUN for president well before Hillary stepped aside during the 2008 Democratic convention.  For Hillary supporters the end of their affiliation with the democratic party happened on May 31st, 2008 when the corruption of the party was in full view as Clinton delegates were given to Obama in states where he wasn’t even on the ballot.  It was obvious then that the powers that be had decided who was going to be the nominee and it did not matter who the people had voted for.  That is when the digging on Barry really started and the fake COLB was produced.  TPTB tried to deflect the attention to Obama/Soetoro being born in Hawaii but the true issue was his ineligibility because of his british citizenship at birth from his father’s side and his indonesian citizenship from his step-father. (more…)

AYFKM? ‘Rebuking’ the pResident Over Libya?

AYFKM? ‘Rebuking’ the pResident Over Libya?

I asked the above question over a month ago and now the candyasses in the District of Criminals are fawning all over themselves for passing  A (one, single) non-binding resolution ‘rebuking’ the sitting poseur in the White House for tearing up the Constitution YET AGAIN with Libya and the War Powers Act.  They want him to ‘explain himself’ or they might just cut off funding for the war? AYFKM?  Which one exactly would they be talking about since they didn’t declare any of them?  And what about the rest of the sh** this assclown has done since well before taking office? (more…)

Obama Signs New Executive Order; Congress Officially Irrelevant (UPDATED)

Obama Signs New Executive Order; Congress Officially Irrelevant (UPDATED)

(Update at bottom of post)


Are you ready kids?  (Whenever I say this to the RedLemur, he knows it’s gonna be bad…)

Barry Soetoro, current resident of the White House, has signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies to review regulations and produce a plan for changes to the current regulations based on the best science available.

Bye-bye Congress.

(All emphasis from this point on is the editor’s and is meant to highlight portions that require reading!!!)

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
January 18, 2011

Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review – Executive Order

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to improve regulation and regulatory review, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1General Principles of Regulation.  (a)  Our regulatory system must protect public health, welfare, safety, and our environment while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation.  It must be based on the best available science. It must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas.  It must promote predictability and reduce uncertainty.  It must identify and use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.  It must take into account benefits and costs, both quantitative and qualitative.  It must ensure that regulations are accessible, consistent, written in plain language, and easy to understand.  It must measure, and seek to improve, the actual results of regulatory requirements.

(b)  This order is supplemental to and reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing contemporary regulatory review that were established in Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993.  As stated in that Executive Order and to the extent permitted by law, each agency must, among other things:  (1) propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs (recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify); (2) tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives, taking into account, among other things, and to the extent practicable, the costs of cumulative regulations; (3) select, in choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity); (4) to the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than specifying the behavior or manner of compliance that regulated entities must adopt; and (5) identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including providing economic incentives to encourage the desired behavior, such as user fees or marketable permits, or providing information upon which choices can be made by the public.

(c)  In applying these principles, each agency is directed to use the best available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible.  Where appropriate and permitted by law, each agency may consider (and discuss qualitatively) values that are difficult or impossible to quantify, including equity, human dignity, fairness, and distributive impacts.

Sec. 2Public Participation.  (a)  Regulations shall be adopted through a process that involves public participation. To that end, regulations shall be based, to the extent feasible and consistent with law, on the open exchange of information and perspectives among State, local, and tribal officials, experts in relevant disciplines, affected stakeholders in the private sector, and the public as a whole.

How did that public participation work out for us on Obamacare, Cap and Trade, and the Net Neutrality?

(b)  To promote that open exchange, each agency, consistent with Executive Order 12866 and other applicable legal requirements, shall endeavor to provide the public with an opportunity to participate in the regulatory process.  To the extent feasible and permitted by law, each agency shall afford the public a meaningful opportunity to comment through the Internet on any proposed regulation, with a comment period that should generally be at least 60 days.  To the extent feasible and permitted by law, each agency shall also provide, for both proposed and final rules, timely online access to the rulemaking docket on regulations.gov, including relevant scientific and technical findings, in an open format that can be easily searched and downloaded.  For proposed rules, such access shall include, to the extent feasible and permitted by law, an opportunity for public comment on all pertinent parts of the rulemaking docket, including relevant scientific and technical findings.

(c)  Before issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking, each agency, where feasible and appropriate, shall seek the views of those who are likely to be affected, including those who are likely to benefit from and those who are potentially subject to such rulemaking.

Sec. 3Integration and Innovation.  Some sectors and industries face a significant number of regulatory requirements, some of which may be redundant, inconsistent, or overlapping.  Greater coordination across agencies could reduce these requirements, thus reducing costs and simplifying and harmonizing rules.  In developing regulatory actions and identifying appropriate approaches, each agency shall attempt to promote such coordination, simplification, and harmonization.  Each agency shall also seek to identify, as appropriate, means to achieve regulatory goals that are designed to promote innovation.

Sec. 4Flexible Approaches.  Where relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives, and to the extent permitted by law, each agency shall identify and consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public. These approaches include warnings, appropriate default rules, and disclosure requirements as well as provision of information to the public in a form that is clear and intelligible.

I wouldn’t have expected anything less from the poseur in the White House who really truly believes he knows better than you or your elected representatives; “identify and consider…freedom of choice for the public.”

Sec. 5Science.  Consistent with the President’s Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies,

“Scientific Integrity” (March 9, 2009), and its implementing guidance, each agency shall ensure the objectivity of any scientific and technological information and processes used to support the agency’s regulatory actions.

Sec. 6Retrospective Analyses of Existing Rules.  (a)  To facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations, agencies shall consider how best to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been learned.  Such retrospective analyses, including supporting data, should be released online whenever possible.

(b)  Within 120 days of the date of this order, each agency shall develop and submit to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs a preliminary plan, consistent with law and its resources and regulatory priorities, under which the agency will periodically review its existing significant regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed so as to make the agency’s regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives.

There it is folks; Congress is now irrelevant.

Sec. 7General Provisions.  (a)  For purposes of this order, “agency” shall have the meaning set forth in section 3(b) of Executive Order 12866.

(b)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(c)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(d)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 18, 2011.

UPDATE:

A commentor left a note about finding out who is behind the executive orders. I am reposting an article from November 9th, 2010.

Institute for Policy Studies Pushing For Obama Executive Orders

World Net Daily is reporting that a Soros funded group, Institute for Policy Studies believes that ‘Progressives Won!’ and because they only lost three members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, they feel justified in writing as many executive orders as possible and ‘pushing’ Obama to do the right thing and sign them now that the blue-dogs have been eliminated. How’s that for some interesting circular thinking America? You must want progressive mandates because you didn’t vote Nancy and her anti-Constitutional cohorts out. Psychotropic drugs anyone?

Buck Up People…Progressives WON!

Dead weight gone. Good Riddance. The blame for the stalemate to come can now fall squarely where it belongs…on the anti-progressive, anti-democratic, anti-populist Republican members of Congress.

Our work is now finally beginning. The veil of a happy Democratic governing majority is finally lifted. We didn’t have it then; We don’t have it now. But what we do have now is a more solidly progressive bunch of Dems in Congress and a president presumably less encumbered by the false illusion that playing nice will get him a date with the other team.

Let’s throw our support unabashedly behind the Congressional Progressive Caucus and let’s push Obama to finally do the right thing through as many Executive Orders as we can present to him.

(Editor’s Note: Please remember that progressives like Soros and the groups he funds are only one agenda at the table. They aren’t the only ones playing the game of ‘Divide, Conquer, and Pillage America’. My money is still on the international central bankers who, in my opinion, are using the left and the far right to do their dirty work.)

Soros group wants Obama to rule by executive order

Organization cites mid-terms, claims progressives registered victory

NEW YORK – It was progressives who won the mid-term elections, particularly incumbents in a socialist-founded congressional caucus that emerged from last week’s ballots virtually unscathed, boasted an article published by the George Soros-funded Institute for Policy Studies, a Marxist-oriented think-tank in Washington, D.C.

The article recommends that President Obama govern from executive order to push through a progressive agenda.

“Progressives won in the 2010 mid-term elections,” wrote Karen Dolan, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, or IPS, and director of the Cities for Progress and Cities for Peace projects based at the radical organization.

“The Congressional Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus in the House Democratic Caucus at over 80 members, emerged virtually unscathed, losing only three members,” she wrote, in the piece published on the IPS website.

“By contrast, the conservative Blue Dog Democratic caucus was more than sliced in half from 54 members to only 26. Further, of the 34 conservative Dems who voted against Obama’s Healthcare Reform, a mere 12 won re-election,” she wrote.

Dolan declared that “our work is now finally beginning.”

“The veil of a happy Democratic governing majority is finally lifted. We didn’t have it then; We don’t have it now. But what we do have now is a more solidly progressive bunch of Dems in Congress and a president presumably less encumbered by the false illusion that playing nice will get him a date with the other team.”

She went on to recommend that progressives “throw our support unabashedly behind the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and let’s push Obama to finally do the right thing through as many Executive Orders as we can present to him.”

WND reported the Congressional Progressive Caucus was founded by the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA.

Institute for Policy Studies

  • America’s oldest leftwing think tank
  • Has long supported Communist and anti-American causes around the world

The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) was founded in 1963 as a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization with seed money (derived from a fortune made in cosmetics sales under the Faberge trade name) from the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin (1901-1978) was a Russian Bolshevik and the father of Cora Weiss, who headed the Samuel Rubin Foundation from its inception and is currently the principal financier of IPS. Weiss’ husband, Peter, is Chairman of the IPS Board of Trustees. He is also a member of the National Lawyers Guild and the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee, both of which were created as Communist Party fronts. The Weisses selected Richard J. Barnet and Marcus Raskin to be the first co-directors of IPS, with the aim of transforming the United States by altering public attitudes, changing laws, and reversing foreign policy through an Academy that reached every nexus of the national nervous system.

(more…)

John Boehner Election Eve Speech, Ohio, 11.1.2010 (‘Patriots’)

I may not agree that John Boehner should be Speaker as my personal preference is for a true Constitutionalist like Ron Paul to be wielding the gavel, BUT he does understand that Americans are NOT the enemy and shouldn’t be punished.

Yet another open mouth/insert foot truthful moment from the Narcissist-in-Chief.

Obama seeks to blunt Republican attack over comment

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama said on Monday he should not have used the word “enemies” to describe his political opponents as Republicans sought to make an issue of the comment a day before congressional elections.

Obama, in an interview with talk radio host Michael Baisden, said, “I probably should have used the word ‘opponents’ instead of enemies.”

He was backtracking from a comment he made a week ago in an interview with Univision radio in which he sought to persuade Hispanics to vote for Democratic candidates instead of Republicans.

“If Latinos sit out the election instead of, ‘we’re going to punish our enemies and we’re going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us’ — if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s going to be harder,” Obama had said.

Since when does an ‘American President’ speak about punishing other Americans? Who the Frak is this guy? Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Chavez?

Boehner, 11.1.2010:

Bad Behavior has blocked 1845 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: