California Prepares To Confiscate Guns From ‘Mentally Ill’

California Prepares To Confiscate Guns From ‘Mentally Ill’

The Powers That Be know they cannot just order their jackboots to confiscate firearms from law-abiding citizens.  Patriotic members of the military and law enforcement will refuse to do such an un-Constitutional act against the general populace, but given a ‘good’ reason, they’ll go along with it.  Here is the backdoor reason; mental illness.  Now that the un-Constitutional Obamacare is in place, your doctor may be ‘enlisted’ to ask you questions about firearms you may own.  What happens to the patient that is placed on Wellbutrin for smoking cessation (as millions have been) only to have law enforcement show up to confiscate their firearms because this form of medication is an antidepressant?

It appears that California is setting the stage for just such an event.  From Sheriff Paul Schrader of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon is Ready to Confiscate Weapons From Your Home

I received some disturbing information this week. Sheriff John McMahon’s staff has a “list” of names that have been compiled by the Department of “mentally ill” individuals who have guns registered to them. It is the intention of the Department to confiscate these guns without due process.

Just last week, the California Senate approved a $24 million funding bill to expedite the process of collecting guns from owners in the state who legally acquired them but have since become disqualified due to mental illness.

Such was recently the case for one woman, who had been in the hospital voluntarily for mental illness last year that she says was due to medication she was taking. Lynette Phillips of Upland, CA said she had purchased a gun years ago for her husband, David, as a present. That gun, as well as two others registered to her law-abiding husband (who does not have a history of felonies or mental illness), were seized.

Her husband is upset that they took the right from him that should never have been taken.

But according to the state of California, that doesn’t matter.

“The prohibited person can’t have access to a firearm” regardless of who the registered owner is, Michelle Gregory, a spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office.

The California Department of Justice is running a program to confiscate registered guns from homes that local law enforcement refused to implement. It’s called the Armed Prohibited Persons (APPs) program.

Merely being in a database of registered gun owners and having a “disqualifying event,” such as a isn’t sufficient evidence for a search warrant, So the officers often must talk their way into a residence to look for weapons.

How does the Department know who is mentally ill and who at the Department defines mental illness?

Gun owners are losing their 2nd Amendment rights without due process.

HIPAA Laws are likely being compromised and the 4th and 5th Amendments are being violated in some of these cases.

Just like anyone, I do not want a mentally ill person to own a firearm. But I do not want the government taking guns from sane people they call mentally ill.

KeepItUp

What Part Of ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ DO THEY NOT GET?????

What Part Of ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ DO THEY NOT GET?????

Infringement

 

The 2nd Amendment:

As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

INFRINGE (from Merriam-Webster):

to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent>

Pretty simple, yes?  In fact, so cleanly written by the founders that it would likely be impossible that a five year would not understand it.  Yet…..there are millions of globalist tools out there that believe that background checks, registration, confiscation, and banning guns would stop violence.  Alas, that isn’t the point of this post.  What these assclowns do not get (even though we keep banging our heads against the wall in an effort to educmacate them) is that it does not matter what they think about the Second Amendment and gun violence; what matters is that this amendment is in place to STOP TYRANNY like the kind we have been experience for a couple decades now.  The founders of this great nation knew that if power became centrally located (like we are experiencing currently with the District of Criminals), we would lose our GOD-GIVEN rights, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and our lives.  What is even sadder is that the first idiots marched off are going to be these tools of the globalists once their usefulness has come to an end.  The founders wanted to make this amendment and it’s purpose so simple that no one would even think to fiddle around with it.  Welcome to the brainwashed progressive agenda that does not want Americans to know about the legacy of collectivism.

In an effort to possibly get through to some of our brainwashed fellow Americans, I am posting a video from Publius Huldah on why every single law that has been passed INFRINGING ON THE 2ND AMENDMENT is un-Constitutional and therefore, null and void.  If you think I will be registering any of my firearms and/or handing them over to the government willingly, you are sadly mistaken.

Nunc Pro Tunc: The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings (James Wesley Rawles)

This is a standing invitation to my fellow Americans: If congress ever enacts a law mandating the registration and/or a production ban of detachable magazine semiautomatic rifles then you are hereby invited to the town square of your local community. There, burn barrels will be set up and we will publicly burn Form 4473s, FFL Bound Books, state and local registration records, and the sales receipts for every firearm in the United States. On that same day, FFL holders and public officials holding electronic firearms records will simultaneously erase those records, permanently and irretrievably. (Using special file erasure software such as Blancco, X-Ways, and Stellar Wipe, or though the physical destruction of disk drives.)

Spontaneous Gatherings, Spontaneous Combustion

This burn barrel day–likely to be held the day after the President signs any new draconian legislation–will include speeches, public prayers, and the blessing of those who have gathered by ministers, rabbis, and priests.

The core of the activities on that day will be stalwart public defiance of any new unconstitutional law(s), the open and notorious destruction of records that might be used to enslave us, and vocal public affirmations of solidarity of free men and women, in the face of tyranny. This will be a defining moment for America–a line drawn in the sand. We will forthrightly declare that we will not obey any unconstitutional law and that we will treat it dismissively, as if it had never been enacted — nunc pro tunc. We will pledge ourselves to the defense of liberty, both individually and collectively. We will vow that if ever called to jury duty, we will nullify any unconstitutional laws, vacating the charges against the accused, in accordance with our long-standing right as jurors. (See: www.FIJA.org.)

The Law is On Our Side

We will publicly re-affirm some long standing precepts of American jurisprudence, to wit:

§ 195 Generally

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law(1) but is wholly void(2) and ineffective for any purpose.(3) Since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it,(4) an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed(5) and never existed;(6) that is, it is void ab initio.(7) Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.(8)

Since an unconstitutional law is void, it follows that generally the statute imposes no duties,(9) confers no rights,(10) creates no office(11) or liabilities,(12) bestows no power or authority on anyone,(13) affords no protection,(14) is incapable of creating any rights or obligations,(15) does not allow for the granting of any relief,(16) and justifies no acts performed under it.(17)

Once a statute is determined to be unconstitutional, no private citizen or division of the state may take any further action pursuant to its provisions.(18) A contract that rests on an unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation.(19) No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law,(20) and no courts are bound to enforce it.(21) A law contrary to the United States Constitution may not be enforced.(22) Once a statute has been declared unconstitutional, courts thereafter have no jurisdiction over alleged violations.(23) Persons convicted and fined under a statute subsequently held unconstitutional may recover the fines paid.(24)

 JeffersonGunBan

Bad Behavior has blocked 1508 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: