Some light reading for the corporate-owned moos on this day after the rapture…yep, it just keeps getting better and better….
WikiLeaks: ‘North American Initiative’ no ‘theory’
Memo: ‘Most believe the incremental approach most appropriate at this time’
A document posted online by WikiLeaks reveals that there were strategy discussions regarding the adoption of a “North American Union” – called the North American Initiative in this case – at the ambassadorial level in the United States government.
The concept of a North American Union largely has been ridiculed by many in government and media. The Wikipedia entry on North American Union calls it a “theoretical economic union” that has “been the subject of various conspiracy theories.”However, WND has built an extensive library of reports that document progress toward the idea, and best-selling author Jerome Corsi’s book, “The Late Great USA,” shows how the Security and Prosperity Partnership, an agreement signed in 2005 by President George W. Bush, threatens American sovereignty.
The document, from “a secret 2005 U.S. embassy cable from Ottawa signed by then-Ambassador Paul Cellucci,” states:
An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers. Our research leads us to conclude that such a package should tackle both ‘security’ and ‘prosperity’ goals. This fits the recommendations of Canadian economists who have assessed the options for continental integration. While in principle many of them support more ambitious integration goals, like a customs union/single market and/or single currency, most believe the incremental approach is most appropriate at this time, and all agree that it helps pave the way to these goals if and when North Americans choose to pursue them.
In the document, released April 28, Cellucci “expounds upon a well researched and refined plan to mostly replace the existing borders of sovereign nations with some kind of privacy-invading biometric ‘security perimeter,’ where the borders of the nations will still stand, but information will be exchanged on all citizens in the nations, thus creating a super state law enforcement effort to manage security,” according to ALIPAC.
ALIPAC’s report said, “The document specifically states that Cellucci and his fellow conspirators fear the U.S. could wake up and secure the borders against contagious diseases and terrorism. He points out that financial interests in Canada fear U.S. attempts to protect citizens from terrorism or pandemics and could interfere with some financial interests in Canada.”
The document states:
Even with zero tariffs, our land borders have strong commercial effects. Some of these effects are positive (such as law enforcement and data gathering), so our governments may always want to keep some kind of land border in place… The risk that business will be obstructed at the border by discretionary U.S. actions, such as measures to defend against terrorism or infectious disease, in addition to growing congestion, have become major risks to the economy, inhibiting investment in Canada.
According to ALIPAC, “Here we have a man who has sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the people who pay his exorbitant salary and expenses with their hard earned taxes and who is taking the side of financial interests that cannot be bothered by dead Americans killed by Mexican flu pandemics and other diseases, rampaging armies of illegal alien marauders, or the lethal terrorists among them.”
The organization warned, “The document is very clear about moving slowly and incrementally and not attempting to arouse public suspicions by making a big move all at once.”
Part of the document:
For goodness sake, Canadians are not all economists. Certainly our present prime minister is one but he doesn’t set policy by himself. The great bulk of Canadians have already agreed many, many years ago to live a less monied existance than their American cousins and thereofre are not part of America today. Nothing has changed in that respect. If the US wants to cut Canada off at the knees, let it do so. It is definitely within their power to accomplish but it will suffer and suffer greatly if it goes in that direction. Just think, no more oil, no more water no more natural resources of any kind. I think Canada will persevere one way or the other. China would be only too happy to replace the US as Canada’s biggest trade partner. They actually lust for access to Canada’s natural resources. you know they do have 1.25 billion people to keep satisfied. Canadians who have half a brain do not want any closer relationship with the US than they already have because of unfoprtunate proximity. Any Canadain that remembers history can recite the 54-40 or fight jingle. they can recall Britain’s treachery when half the coastline of British Columbia was given to the US when it bought Alaska from the Russians. Oh yes, Canada has a lot of real concerns with US acquisitivness but it doesn’t have to give in to it.
NO, NAFTA,NO WTO, NO UN!
and this is my new car burns hundred gallons an hour goes no where looks cool, kinda like our gov.!