Tavis Smiley going for the gold and pulling the race card out many months too soon in Obama’s re-election campaign.
I said over a year ago that this was going to be, this presidential race, Lawrence, was going to be the ugliest, the nastiest, the most divisive, and the most racist, the most racist in the history of this Republic, I did not know that that race to the bottom would begin so quickly.
I saw it coming because it’s pretty clear, given how the tea party has acted, given that Donald Trump is now playing to the worst in the tea party, that this would be possible. I don’t want to demonize or cast asperation on the tea party broadly; I believe that there is a certain angst that many people in that entity feel, and I share that angst about government. I don’t believe that it is the solution to reduce government. Government does have a role to play; we can figure out and debate what that role is, but there have been semantics they have engaged in that made it clear to me; showing up at rallies with guns, and the Secret Service, you know, working overtime to protect this president, more threats against his life than any president in the history of the nation, indeed all the presidents combined; so the evidence is pretty clear that they would do anything and say anything in order to make sure he does not get re-elected.
I would agree with Tavis that there probably has been more threats to Chairman Zero’s life than all presidents combined; most likely because most Americans cannot tolerate intense stupidity, liars, thieves, and lazy SOBs; all of which Barack Obama has fulfilled. 57 states, ‘you’ll be able to keep your medical coverage and doctor’, ‘we have to spend our way to prosperity’, golfing while Egypt and Libya burn…
What happens to the race card if The Anointed One is forced to run against one of these tea party backed favs?
So now that we have that bullsh** out of the way, let’s examine the possible reasons that Barack Hussein Obama may not get relected:
- Continued high unemployment;
- 44 Million Americans on food stamps;
- Government takeover of banks, financial industries instruments, car companies, health care, student loans, etc.;
- The ‘Apology Tour’;
- Appointing non-judges to the Supreme Court;
- Unelected radical leftists running the government as appointed czars;
- The collapse of the dollar;
- Getting permission from the UN for an invasion into Libya without prior Congressional declaration;
- Continued fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan killing Americans and draining future generations’ ability to provide for themselves and their families;
- Continuation of the Patriot Act;
- DoJ’s ‘look the other way’ on racism charges;
- Pushing a green agenda at a time where there is NO ROOM FOR ERROR;
- Off-shore drilling ban while subsidizing foreign countries’ oil endeavors WITH OUR MONEY;
- Inflation leading to hyper-inflation;
- Backdoor maneuvers to establish regulation of industries without congressional debate, legislation, or law.
- Circumventing the Rule of Law….
- Collapsing the economy thru spending-on-steroids and hidden tax hikes;
- Just plain too radical or too stupid to be re-elected no matter how the banksters and globalists try to package him this time around;
- A complete and total lack of understanding of what Constitutional Principles are and how to live by them;
- Allowing illegal aliens to cross the border and kidnap and murder Americans (also known as invasion);
- An all-around shitty job of taking care of Americans’ safety and prosperity;
- etc., etc., etc.,.
Equating Donald Trump bringing up the birth certificate issue with racism is just plain silly and well below Tavis Smiley’s intellect. I am still trying to figure out what possessed him to make that statement. But while we are discussing the Trump fiasco, let’s get into some particulars for those newbies that don’t realize the depth of this issue.
First, it does not matter where Obama was born, though this writer believes he was born in Kenya and his birth certificate as a United States citizen was ‘phoned in’ later. Let’s really think about this for a moment. You are Stanley Ann Dunham, married to muslim Barack Obama, Sr. whose culture demands submission from women. Your mother-in-law reports being at Barack’s birth in Kenya, and you want your first born child to have every advantage in the world. What do you do? You would make sure that Barack has the gold standard of citizenship, and since it was possible in Hawaii, at that time, to register a foreign birth – Why.Wouldn’t.You? An American mom would be nuts NOT to. I don’t believe there is anything more to it than that. She wanted her child to have every advantage, and in 1961, being an American was as good as it got. It still is today considering how many illegals cross the border to bear their children here, which is yet another topic of discussion considering that entire ‘birth clause’ has nothing to do with children ‘in general’ being born here. It had everything to do with freed black slaves having citizenship; do the research – I’m not making this up.
But let’s get back to the real reason Obama is ineligible to be president. If Obama’s father was Barack, Sr., then Obama had dual citizenship at birth which disqualifies him to be president. Barack, Sr. was a british subject, making Barack, Jr. a british subject. Period. End of story. The next question would be whether or not his step-father, Lolo Soetoro, officially adopted Barry Soetoro as an Indonesian which would then force Obama to give up his dual citizenship as an American and a British subject. Anyway you look at the data, it still comes back as ‘ineligible’ to be president which creates a Constitutional Fiasco of Biblical Proportions; which is also why nobody in any of the branches of government has come forward to state this guy is ineligible to be president.
I just ran across an op-ed that is following the same train of thought about Stanley Ann.
Again, why should we believe that Obama is a U.S. citizen? Actually, some evidence exists that he is, but that evidence is very meager and must be weighed against the evidence to the contrary.
Some are persuaded by the birth notices in the Honolulu newspapers a few days after Obama’s purported 1961 nativity, which claimed he was born locally. Now, what do you think would happen if you tried to use that quality of evidence in a court of law (or an Intro Logic class)?
I mean a real court with something other than a liberal Democrat-appointed partisan judge. To begin with, it would be conspicuous that the superior evidence, a birth certificate, is strangely absent. A scientific reaction would parallel that of a jurist, to wit: The primary source takes precedence.
Don’t bother us with a secondary source like the ancient news clippings of unknown validity. Where is the primary source, the birth certificate? Why is that being suppressed? The newspaper items prove nothing other than arousing more suspicion. Where in those yellowed relics is there even a shred of proof that Obama was born in the USA?
Then, naturally, the question would be raised as to whether the putative evidence — i.e., old newspaper clippings or photocopy images thereof — could possibly be explained by something other than the otherwise unsupported assertion of native birth.
To that issue, we now have reports that it was common practice in Hawaii at the time for parents (or grandparents) in cases of nonisland (and potential non-U.S. citizenship) births to fabricate a paper trail with such false newspaper announcement submissions. All it required was an unsworn form filed with the state.
No, this was not necessarily done with the expectation that a newborn would want to run for president over 40 years hence — to dispel a favorite canard of the Obama apologists — but was motivated by a generalized expectation of future benefits of citizenship.
The contrived paper record, in other words, could help undergird a future citizenship claim, it was thought — much as is being done now by Obama! Obviously, this would have been a natural motive with foreign off-island birth cases involving one noncitizen parent, which would have disqualified for citizenship otherwise. Q.E.D.
Then add to this preponderance of evidence that something is amiss the fact that Obama has spent millions in legal fees keeping all of his records sealed and the fact that his very first executive order signed after being sworn in was this:
…which has everything to do with current and former presidents keeping records sealed through use of executive privilege.
(b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and
former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records,
the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during
that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege
by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed
by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for
a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the
set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall
so indicate in the notice.
Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President. (a) Upon receipt
of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General
(directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal
Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate
the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the
Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning
whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.notice.
The second part of the ineligibility op-ed from Investors.com which brings us full circle to the race card:
In fact, evidence mounts that he has executed the most brilliant coup in world history. (This argument also rules out any likelihood that Obama is covering up just to be obstinate.)
4. Alternatively, Obama may in fact be a natural-born American, but then took dual citizenship during his Indonesian years, which he never relinquished. If so, a cover-up on Obama’s part now would still be necessary because he knows U.S. voters would never abide a clandestine dual citizen as President. In that event, a monumental scandal would still prevail.
In fact, when Obama lived in Indonesia as a child, that nation’s government required Indonesian citizenship for school attendance. Obama’s early school records do confirm his Indonesian citizenship. This information may be the closest thing to a smoking gun, as it clinches at least dual citizenship in the strange case of Barack Obama’s background.
(Yes, Obama is already established to be a citizen of Kenya as well, per a technical quirk of that country’s law — even if born in Hawaii to one Kenyan parent, that is — but two foreign citizenships out of three may be too much for the U.S. electorate to digest. Obama probably sees it that way, too; hence, the cover-up of other records, including collegiate, that would impinge on contemporary citizenship.)
Therefore, the Hawaiian birth issue may ultimately and ironically be an immaterial red herring. The critical condition necessitating the gross political deception may have eventuated later and elsewhere. Even if those old Honolulu birth clippings are genuine, it would not matter. If not constitutionally disqualified from office, Obama might be pragmatically. Would that not be the supreme irony?
5. Perhaps the most plausible scenario is that the presumed Mr. Obama never had his legal name changed from Barry Soetoro, and therefore has committed a form of fraud by signing official documents with a false alias, as well as perjury by falsely swearing to that effect on many occasions (as in legal application questions about past use of an alias). That would be in addition to a massive deception of the American voters about his true identity. If this is so, no wonder the so-called Barack Obama feels he must cover it up.
More bald speculation, but on my part this time? Actually, some basic analytic support is at hand: It is fact that Mr. Obama is hiding not only birth records but virtually all vital history, including medical and academic. Yet he and his allies bleat that it is not about citizenship. Well, then — accepting that — what else of comparable magnitude could there be?
It must be something of similar gravity to justify such a full-court press and stonewall defense including the legal expenditures. The possibility of a lesser motive was disposed of previously.
6. If and when Obama and his political handlers play the race card on this matter, that will confirm the absolute worst because that is what they do when they have nothing else. Sadly, we are beginning to witness this tactic already on TV talk shows. Case closed.
The conclusion: Barack Obama’s covered-up background is very likely sufficient to disqualify him from the presidency, perhaps or perhaps not constitutionally through noncitizenship, or more practically because of multiple acts of fraud and deceit over legal name and multiple citizenships. Full public knowledge would surely induce prompt impeachment or electoral pariah status, that is.
Again, poignantly, and finally, if one disagrees: Prove it. You are welcome to try. It should be easy. So why is it so hard? Yes, that question is rhetorical.
In closing, I would like to post an image that I stole from Dr. Kate’s site.
Any more questions?