(Editor’s Note: As with all the information presented in the ‘Noose’ series of articles, please keep an open mind, read the material and corresponding links, do the homework and stop being JUST A MOO producing a revenue stream for the powers that be. Be skeptical; I am. Ask the hard questions. Now more Americans are awake than ever; join us and help us find the ‘real truth’ that has been hidden for centuries. The more people turning over rocks, the faster the truth is going to be known.)
Over the course of the last two months traveling through the labyrinth, I have found it incredibly hard to find a starting point for this series of articles. In desperation, I finally decided to start writing about current events and how discovered research applied to today’s news. Take, for example, the run on Kabul Bank, and the corresponding actions by Afghanistan Central Bank and our Treasury which leads back to the UN, IMF, The Fed, etc. We all know who the players are, what we haven’t been able to prove exactly the combination of who, what, where, when, and how when it comes to wars, national bankruptcies, treaties, government as corporations, and politicians as corporate entities because A) we have been blanketed with thousands of pages in hopes of demoralizing us, and B) much of the documentation is hidden from the public. We know this. To give you some idea of the scope, I spent the morning reading the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783, Bush 41’s EO 12803, and Clinton’s EO 13037 after I had come up empty-handed looking for monetary information on the U.S. Treasury setting up the Afghanistan Central Bank. I know our treasury spent our money on yet another central bank, but find out how much of the billions we have poured into Afghanistan went to establish the bank and anything other than 2002 as a date? Nada. What about Iraq’s central bank which came into existence in 1956 and was nationalized in 1964? Did it change when our government toppled Saddam’s regime? Does it look like The Federal Reserve? What do you think?
Financial Services Tribunal
The CBI law establishes a Financial Services Tribunal empowered to review decisions and orders of the CBI including actions taken by a conservator or receiver under the Banking Law. The Tribunal is not authorized to review CBI decisions or actions concerning monetary policy and exchange rate policy. The Tribunal will comprise panels of judges appointed by the Minister of Justice. Articles 63-70
What about this?
The prior law governing the Central Bank of Iraq was the Central Bank of Iraq Law No. 64 of 1976. The prior law is repealed by the new law. Article 73 In July the Coalition Provisional Authority issued CPA Order No. 18, “Measures to Ensure the Independence of the Central Bank of Iraq.” This order suspended the authority of the CBI to lend to Iraqi Government Ministries and gave the CBI authority to determine and implement monetary and credit policy without the approval of the Ministry of Finance.
Who then would be giving the Central Bank of Iraq their marching orders considering the state the country is still in?
Does this look familiar?
The bank is in charge of:
- Maintaining price stability
- Implementing monetary policy (including exchange rate policies)
- Managing foreign reserves
- Issuing and managing the currency
- Regulating the banking sector for promoting a competitive and stable financial system
I am currently contemplating turning my living room wall into a whiteboard to keep track of all the different parties and agendas in play. What I have been able to ascertain is that the United Nations appears to be ‘the face’ and the hub from which all the different coalitions and policies are being sent forth; equivalent to the biggest airport terminal in the world. I would dearly love to know exactly who owns the airport; ‘The International Banksters’ isn’t specific enough for me. I want names; all their names.
Please take five minutes to watch this video and I guarantee you will be as skeptical as I still am, but more questions than answers still remain. Why does our government vote against its constituents? Why does the FBI consider ‘American Sovereigns’ to be domestic terrorists? Why have the police been para-militarized, and over-react on a daily basis? Why have doctors stopped curing conditions and only treat symptomology? Why has Monsanto been allowed to run wild in Iraq and Afghanistan? Why did WE spend $582 Million to build an Embassy complex in Iraq? Why has the Federal Reserve been allowed to prosper when they have done nothing except the opposite of their supposed mission to ensure economic stability? Why does any nation follow any proposal the United Nations puts forward when nothing but wars and genocide have happened under their ‘peaceful’ watch?
30 Little Known Facts About America:
From FoxNews, 9.8.2010:
By George Russell
After a year of humiliating setbacks, United Nations Secretary General Ban ki-Moon and about 60 of his top lieutenants — the top brass of the entire U.N. system — spent their Labor Day weekend at a remote Austrian Alpine retreat, discussing ways to put their sprawling organization in charge of the world’s agenda.
As a position paper intended for their first group session put it, in the customary glutinous prose of the organization’s internal documents: “the U.N. should be able to take the lead in setting the global agenda, engage effectively with other multinational and regional organizations as well as civil society and non-state stakeholders, and transform itself into a tool to help implement the globally agreed objectives.”
And for that to happen, the paper continues, “it will be necessary to deeply reflect on the substance of sovereignty, and accept that changes in our perceptions are a good indication of the direction we are going.”
According to Mr. Russell, the UN has a ’50-50-50 Challenge’, (that I have NOT been able to find the text of including the UN’s site), that seeks to reduce greenhouse emissions by 50% by 2050 even though the population increase is forecast to be 50% higher than now.
And to do that, the paper suggests, equally dramatic shifts in political power may be needed. “Is the global governance structure, still dominated by national sovereignty, capable of responding with the coherence and speed needed?” it asks. “Or do we need to push the ‘reset’ button and rethink global governance to meet the 50-50-50 Challenge?”
What about your money?
The U.N. bosses also need to make sure that the institution sits at top tables where the world’s financial decisions are made. It is “urgent to secure U.N. participation” at regular meetings of the G-20 finance ministers and their deputies,” according to one of the papers, a group that the U.N. Secretariat, based in New York City and Geneva, does not interact with very much.
That observation ties into another Alpbach theme: pushing global financial regulation even further.
“The much paraded reform of financial governance institutions has not gone far enough,” the position paper for the U.N. leadership’s keynote session asserts, and the voting power of emerging players and developing world, in general, which demand a greater say on these matters, remains inadequate.”
The answer? “An enhanced political will is clearly needed to avoid return to status quo, to push forward regulatory mechanisms, and improve financial governance.”
I urge you to read all of Mr. Russell’s article about these new position papers as it covers the United Nations Police, “setting the international agenda”, and a few stated issues from the papers like this one:
— how to make “clever” use of new technologies to deepen direct ties with what the U.N. calls “civil society,” meaning novel ways to bypass its member nation states and deal directly with constituencies that support U.N. agendas.
Now let’s jump to another part of the United Nations. The World Bank.
The World Bank is a vital source of financial and technical assistance to developing countries around the world. Our mission is to fight poverty with passion and professionalism for lasting results and to help people help themselves and their environment by providing resources, sharing knowledge, building capacity and forging partnerships in the public and private sectors.
We are not a bank in the common sense; we are made up of two unique development institutions owned by 187 member countries: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA).
Each institution plays a different but collaborative role in advancing the vision of inclusive and sustainable globalization. The IBRD aims to reduce poverty in middle-income and creditworthy poorer countries, while IDA focuses on the world’s poorest countries.
Their work is complemented by that of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes(ICSID).
Together, we provide low-interest loans, interest-free credits and grants to developing countries for a wide array of purposes that include investments in education, health, public administration, infrastructure, financial and private sector development, agriculture and environmental and natural resource management.
The World Bank, established in 1944, is headquartered in Washington, D.C. We have more than 10,000 employees in more than 100 offices worldwide.
Actions speak louder than words.
World Bank Threatens “Drastic Steps Necessary” if Nations Refuse Population Reduction Implementation
It’s the eugenicist in the Discovery Channel building multiplied by a million. Not simply a lone eco-terrorist saying “parasitic human infants” must die, but one of the largest international financial institutions demanding it. To make the contrast even more remarkable, James J. Lee scared the living daylights out of some Discovery Channel employees, the IMF & World Bank take hostage entire nations.
In its 1984 World Development Report, the World Bank threatens nations who are slow in implementing the Bank’s “population policies” with “drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom.”
The report, literally saturated with dehumanizing proposals, is devoted entirely to the World Bank’s long-term strategies in regards to population control:
“(…) economic policy and performance in the next decade will matter for population growth in the developing countries for several decades beyond; population policy and change in the rest of this century will set the terms for the whole of development strategy in the next.”
To illustrate how serious the World Bank is in achieving the overall strategy objectives on population control, the report does not shy away from outright threats:
“Population policy has a long lead time; other development policies must adapt in the meantime. Inaction today forecloses options tomorrow, in overall development strategy and in future population policy. Worst of all, inaction today could mean that more drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom, will seem necessary tomorrow to slow population growth.”
In the Foreword, then President of the World Bank and 1985 Bilderberg attendee, A.W. Clausen stated:
“(…) although the direct costs of The World Bank programs to reduce population growth are not large, a greater commitment by the international community is sorely needed to assist developing countries in the great challenge of slowing population growth.”
“(…) governments can use incentives and disincentives to signal their policy on family size”, the report continues. “Through incentives, society as a whole compensates those couples willing to forgo the private benefits of an additional child, helping to close the gap between private and social gains to high fertility.”
Hillary Clinton speaking to the CFR, 9.8.2010 about the United Nations. You let me know how you feel about her gushing about an organization that does not believe in national sovereignty, and is working to redistribute your wealth. (Entire speech at link above.)
An excerpt below for you to consider from the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783. Everything I have run across in the last two weeks is pointing to America not being a sovereign nation, that the Civil War was fought for the South’s land to be used as surety for debt, and that after that war, a newly incorporated federal government started using our labor as surety for their debt. I’m still digging, but reading takes time.
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America,…
I am starting to think that Americans need to push the escape key on this nation instead of spending the next three decades trying to unravel everything that the progressive globalists and the international bankers have ensnared us in.