I just had a conversation with the RedLemur about how I believe that Hillary is going to be mounting another presidential campaign in 2012. Has it been noticed that she is carefully stepping around the landmines of the ‘freedom flotilla’ issue while trying to look like the neutral party who achieves middle east peace?
Ultimately, the solution to this conflict must be found through an agreement based on a two-state solution negotiated between the parties. This incident underscores the urgency of reaching this goal and we remain committed to working with both sides to move forward these negotiations.
I think the situation from our perspective is very difficult and requires careful, thoughtful responses from all concerned. But we fully support the Security Council’s action last night in issuing a presidential statement and we will work to implement the intention that this presidential statement represents.
The conversation turned toward the possibility that Newt Gingrich might run on the republican side and how the idea of Newt in the White House is almost as scary as Rumsfeld or Cheney being anywhere near the Oval.
Which brings me to the theme of this post; if I had a choice for the republican ticket in 2012, who would it be?
West – Ryan in 2012:
Lt. Col. West telling it like it really is!
Paul Ryan at the Obamacare Summit
Why would we want to recycle the same old war horses that got us into this mess in the first place? Isn’t it time for a breath of fresh air that hasn’t been masquerading as something else for decades? Isn’t it time for people so far down on the food chain, that the possibility of them not being involved in the corruption is greater?
(H/T TheRightScoop for the West vid.)
Hillary is an admitted Alinsky progressive (Communist) and she would be no different then our current POS. The Republicans have no one to run, West, Jindal, Newt, Mitt, Hucklebee, Ryan, ect. None of them impress me at all. I guess I’m getting tired of politicians living off of “We The People”,it’s gotten to the point where they don’t care about serving the people, no matter what they say, they are all seeking to serve themselves with our tax money and as many bribes as they can get into their slimy hands.
The founding fathers warned us about paying politicians and we didn’t listen, which resulted in our current situation of corruption, lies, a Kenyan president and a whitehouse full of Communist Czars. The only way to rectify this situation is to pay politicians nothing. Then and maybe only then would we get people with servants hearts willing to serve our country for the common good.
Unfortunately for America, “Where money lies, honor dies”
I agree, we shouldn’t pay them. The constitution requires them to only show up once a year to assure that they are getting something done. I think We the People have the right to go into congress and say “you go, you go, you can stay, etc. Why wait until election day? We need to kick them out now!
I don’t believe Hillary would be the same as the current so-called president. I don’t think she would hide her birth certificate, nor hide medical records, or hide her entire school records. She has nothing to hide like the current president. This world would have been a lot better off had Hillary been honestly elected and allowed to serve our country. Next time around maybe women wont be so intimidated by Hillary and support her, women must stand together. Hillary had enough problems with the MSM and their misogyny, without worrying that women too would throw her under the bus.
DaddysDarlin, please open your eyes. Supporting Hillary because she is a woman is like people of color supporting Obama because he is black. Neither of them are interested in American exceptionalism or sovereignty. I support the message, not the gender, color, creed, etc.
This is a turning point where families will become more divided because the choice is between being an American or being a Globalist. It has nothing to do with gender or race and if you fall into that trap, you will be made a slave by the globalists.
What are you first? American or Female?
I spent many, many months campaigning for Hillary Clinton in 2008. I put my heart and soul into trying to get her elected.
This PUMA, and former democrat will have NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. She is a loyal supporter of the Obama administration……signing small arms treaties with the UN and whatever else she’s asked to do. She is a globalist! She has global interests and she puts that before our country.
Look for Hillary to sign on to LOST ( Law Of Sea Treaty ) which would give the UN control of ALL water ways, seas, rivers etc… Maybe that is exactly what this gulf oil spill is all about… If there is enough panic, disaster, and inability to control this from US government, doop people into thinking the UN can do it! In any case, this crisis will be used to the max by the Obama administration.
I trust neither of them and I believe that Hillary is more dangerous because she has been at the game much longer than Obama and more connected that he will ever be.
I certainly agree with that, DT….. Obama is such an arrogant thug, people are much more prone to catch him at his treasonous moves. Hillary, on the other hand, is much better at deceit.
I don’t say that lightly because I was fooled for many years and did campaign for her. But, we Americans need to understand that we need each other, not the thugs in our current political system ( less a small percentage of good and decent representatives who do represent us and love this country ).
This is not a football game. We don’t need or want party loyalty……we need loyalty to each other because we need each other to win our country back from the brink of destruction.
I want my $500 bucks back that I donated unwillingly. The begging for funds went beyond the pale. Hillary works to do the bidding of Council of Foreign Relations by her own admission.
She forgot she was being taped when she gave that speech.