The Patriot Movement Is A Violent Threat To National Security

I’ve taken a lot of heat from the right when I start bashing the Patriot Act for being the single most dangerous Act to be passed by the cowardly congress when it comes to the inherent infringement on privacy, liberty, and the amount of control the government now has over everything you do.   Every time you see a camera at an intersection recording your face, your plate, and your car; think Patriot Act and the NWO globalists tracking, what they believe is, their property.

The argument is that we have to catch the terrorists at any cost, and that our national security agencies have to do whatever they deem necessary to accomplish that mission.  Poppycock!  The  slowly awakening but too trusting sheeples are going to have to make a choice soon between standing tall or kneeling as the shackles are put on.

If you are a blogger, citizen journalist, or a tea party patriot; pay attention because the Climate of Fear just got a bit thicker.

ABC News video–whistleblowers expose massive government violations of privacy

When the Conservative Examiner presented proof in a 7-part series that the Obama government is engaging in covert activities to rob citizens of their liberties, naysayers dismissed the information as ‘inconclusive,’ despite the reliability of the unnamed sources for that information.

However, ABC News interviewed a whistleblower who exposes a massive government intrusion into the privacy of all citizens by reading their emails and Instant Messages, listening to their phone calls, monitoring their movements on the Internet, and tracking the ‘Patriot movement’ as a ‘violent threat’ to national security, although no one in the Patriot movement has engaged in such violence.

Not only that, but the government is working with a corporation–AT&T–in order to accomplish this privacy violation:

Note that this secret program was exposed in 2008, while George W. Bush was President.

Thus, we know for a fact that the government has been doing exactly what was claimed in the Conservative Examiner series on Obama’s 4th Reich.  Only the faces have changed.  The program is the same and has in fact been kicked up into high gear under the Obama Administration.

In fact, People for Freedom reports that the Pentagon’s Cyber Command is currently preparing to wage war against American citizens who insist on liberty and the adherence to the U.S. Constitution. :

Early last week the Air Force assigned approximately 30,000 “digital troops” to “the front lines of cyber warfare,” a number that represents a third of the troops in Afghanistan. “The transformation is part of the service’s larger emphasis on cyberspace operations and merging most computer system operations and network warfare functions under Space Command’s 24th Air Force, based at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas,” reported the Air Force Times on May 19.

But the bombshell that was revealed in this latest expose of secret government operations directly impacts bloggers and citizen journalists who are not ‘authorized’ by government to report their propaganda:

According to investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, at least some members of the NSA want to deal with pesky bloggers in a more direct and deadly fashion. In August of 2008, Madsen reported that an executive level NSA staff person was on record saying that significant sentiment exists within the NSA to kill troublesome bloggers and journalists.

Added to this disturbing information is the fact that at West Point last week Barack Obama called for a ‘new international order:

These various factors add up to one big concerted attack on average American citizens by the present government and its enablers in the mega-corporate world.

The jackboot is on our throats.

(H/T PM)

8 thoughts on “The Patriot Movement Is A Violent Threat To National Security”

    • Before one can define what a true patriot movement is one must fist define who a true patriot is.

      1. A true patriot is one who loves his country and would defend it against all enemies foreign and/or domestic.
      2. A true patriot believes in the U.S. Constitution, and the liberty and/or sovereignty it provides for the people of this country.
      3. A true patriot understands that all veterans of World war 1, World War 11, Vietnam, and all other wars fought and died to preserve the rights of liberty and/or sovereignty of all people (citizens) as granted under the U.S. Constitution.

      However, there are those in this country who have taken it upon them selves to redefine what a true patriot and a true patriot movement is. A clear example of this is how Homeland Security lexicon defines a patriot movement.

      (U) patriot movement (U//FOUO) A term used by rightwing extremists to link their
      beliefs to those commonly associated with the American Revolution. The patriot movement primarily comprises violent antigovernment groups such as militias and sovereign citizens. (also: Christian patriots, patriot group, Constitutionalists, Constitutionist)

  1. Here is another billboard for you.
    An unnamed company in Wisconsin has rented a billboard calling for President Obama’s impeachment.
    The billboard along Highway 41 in Oshkosh reads, “Impeach Obama.” The tagline says: “America’s small businesses are failing; help us spread the message.”

  2. Hillary just finished touring the BOEING Plant in China. Boeing in China, yep. Nice huh? She’s rich and doesn’t need to worry about a lost job from BOEING…nope…now manufactured in China… Makes you never want to fly again.
    Allow me to give you some background:
    BOEING, once a huge employer in Seattle area and Oregon, employed tons and tons of people making a living wage for many years. In the recent past, the creeps shipped out BOEING operations to China and everyone lost their jobs, pensions, and way of life. BOEING manufactured some of the world’s best aircrafts. NOT ANYMORE. Shipping our jobs out is unpatriotic and this must stop. Treason has been committed against the citizens of USA and began with Clinton, passed onto BUSH and now SOBama.

    • Thanks for the images – and yes, the Clinton-Bush-Obama trifecta of NWO globalists is going to be the death of the republic unless we stop it. Our time is coming.

  3. The patriot act is not the biggest threat to this country. The biggest threat to this country is the tyrants in our government who enacted the patriot and then renewed it. Our elected representatives should have removed all sections within the original patriot act that was ruled by the courts as being unconstitutional prior to its renewal.

    These same elected representatives have also taken it upon their selves to created a quasi government within this country, without ever considering the constitutionality of it prior to its creation.


    Report for Congress Order Code RL30533
    “Time will tell whether the emergence of the quasi government is to be viewed
    as a symptom of decline in our democratic government, or a harbinger of a new,
    creative management era where the purported artificial barriers between the
    governmental and private sectors are breached as a matter of principle”
    (Re: summary Section)

    Definition of QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL
    1: supported by the government but managed privately

    Definition of QUASI-LEGISLATIVE
    1: having a partly legislative character by possession of the right to make rules and
    regulations having the force of law

    2: essentially legislative in character but not within the legislative power or function
    especially as constitutionally defined

    Definition of QUASI-JUDICIAL
    1: having a partly judicial character by possession of the right to hold hearings on and
    conduct investigations into disputed claims and alleged infractions of rules and
    regulations and to make decisions in the general manner of courts
    2: essentially judicial in character but not within the judicial power or function especially
    as constitutionally defined

    CRS Report for Congress Order Code RL33777
    “….Quasi governmental entities may be viewed as a form of privatization because
    they are substitutes for fully governmental agencies. They are private vehicles for
    achieving a governmentally declared good.77 Policymakers have been attracted to
    quasi governmental entities for a number of reasons, including the popular perception
    that the private sector is more efficient than government and budgetary constraints….”
    (Re: CRS-17)

    Several recent Supreme Court separations of powers decisions have noted that there are three, and only three, distinct branches of government; ‘independent’ agencies, therefore, either are in one of the three branches or they are unconstitutional. See Symposium on Administrative Law, The Uneasy Constitutional Status of Administrative Agencies, 36 AM. U.L. REV. 276 (forthcoming 1987) (discussing, inter alia, INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 951-52, 953 n.16 (1983); Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982) (plurality opinion); Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 118-41 (1976) (per curiam)); see also Note, Incorporation of Executive Agencies into the Executive Branch, 94 YALE L.J. 1766 (1985). Of course, this is not a new concern. See, e.g., 1 K. DAVIS, supra note 2, § 2.7.

    The Attorney General has stated:
    Agencies have no inherent lawmaking powers. They are not creatures of the Constitution. . . .
    . . . .
    This means we should abandon the idea that there are such things as ‘quasi- legislative’ or ‘quasi-judicial’ functions that can be properly delegated to independent agencies or bodies. . . .
    . . . [F]ederal agencies performing executive functions are themselves properly agents of the executive. They are not ‘quasi’ this, or ‘independent’ that.

    Address by Attorney General Edwin Meese III, Federal Bar Association, Detroit, Mich. (Sept. 13, 1985). The Justice Department took a similar position in litigation over the constitutionality of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act. See Brief for United States at 44-51, Bowsher v. Synar, 106 S. Ct. 3181 (1986) (No. 85-1377).

    Independent Agencies and Government Corporations
    “Independent establishments are created by Congress to address concerns that go beyond the scope of ordinary legislation. These agencies are responsible for keeping the government and economy running smoothly.” (Re:

    What is the definition of legislation? defines “legislation” as:
    1. the act of making or enacting laws.
    2. a law or a body of laws enacted.

    Note: Congress has no lawful authority to create Independent Agencies and
    Government Corporations which go beyond the law. (ordinary legislation)

    “Our Bill Rights curbs all three branches of government. It subjects all departments of government to a rule of law and sets boundaries beyond which no official may go.”

    Here are a few interesting quotes of Abraham Lincoln pertaining to our Constitution .

    Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
    Abraham Lincoln

    Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.
    Abraham Lincoln

    We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.
    Abraham Lincoln

  4. I encourage everyone to watch this new hard hitting documentary on google called United We Fall(full). It exposes the NAU – North American Union that most people still don’t know about. I encourage everyone to get this out there. Make it part of your outgoing email, post it on ther bulletains. The great thing about this is that it is bipartisan. Thus, it is less likely to “attack someone’s ego”, and it is spoken about BY the globalists, thus, there is no denial. There approach was very crafty, smart and well put together. This could be the film that wakes people up!

Comments are closed.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1058 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: