Today’s AYFKM? Why National Security Is A Joke

Today’s AYFKM? Why National Security Is A Joke

Today’s AYFKM? Award goes to whatever intelligence moronic agency or agencies that compiles the no-fly list.  This definitely falls under the category of keeping on eye on Americans vs. catching terrorists.  Hasn’t the Patriot Act that was passed without being read because of a rather convenient anthrax attack a freakin’ God-send?  Don’t you feel safer?

In the category of “I can’t believe I’m asking these questions”, how long does it take to get a baby’s name off the no fly-list, and why is it necessary to frisk an eight year old boy?  This is not about stupidity, this is about big brother.  I hope that everybody continues to pay attention to what this 8 year old boy scout is doing, and y’all stop worrying about those jihadist training camps in New York state.

Scout, 8, mistaken for suspect on US no-fly list frisked at airports

An eight-year-old boy scout has been repeatedly frisked at airports in America because he has the same name as a person on a security watch list.

Michael Winston Hicks, from New Jersey, was first singled out as a baby when his mother tried to get him on a flight in Florida. She was told by airline officials that her son’s name “was on the list”.

As a two-year-old the boy, who is known as Mikey, was patted down by security officers at Newark Airport, which reduced him to tears.

His name appears to be among 13,500 on the “selectee” list, which sets off a high level of security screening, after a man called Michael Hicks at some point triggered suspicion.

It is not on the much smaller no-fly list which has about 2,500 names, mostly of non-US citizens.

His mother, Najlah Feanny Hicks, a photojournalist, told the New York Times that Mikey was badly shaken returning from their recent holiday to the Bahamas when he was aggressively frisked re-entering the US.

“A terrorist can blow his underwear up and they don’t catch him,” she told the newspaper. “But my eight-year-old can’t walk through security without being frisked.

“I understand the need for security but this is ridiculous.”

Liberty Comes At A Cost

Liberty Comes At A Cost

It’s time for thoughtful reflection about the amount of value that the Monster brings you each and every day.  With the exception of a few devoted readers that sent me to the 9.12 March and the very same readers replacing my dead computer, I have been carrying the cost of LM for over 14 months.  As much as we would like to believe that some things come free, it’s just not true.  The dilemma for this site is that it is at the tipping point of popularity with little sponsorship, and yet LM continues to be one of the internet’s greatest assets. (As evidenced by almost 5 million hits in 14 months)

As many of my readers know, I am the mom of a special needs child.  My family’s experience with our very own 7.0 earthquake back in 2006 has put our family in the position where my son suffers from PTSD and the physical and mental stress of being in a school environment inhibits his ability to focus on learning.  While I was employed as a executive assistant for a painting contractor, I was able to work out of my home and home-school my child.  I no longer have that position thanks to the democrats and Wall Street which necessitates looking for evening employment in my former industry, waiting tables in a restaurant.  Four months into my unemployment, restaurants in my little town continue to close, and the only position currently being advertised is a cashier at McDonald’s.  I’m not sure they would hire me with almost 3 decades of high end restaurant experience – do you?

Many of my readers also know that I run my fiscal home in the black, and because I recognized the impending tsunami of recession, I took care of debt and pared down my budget to a very modest figure.  I do not require tons of cash each month to keep my family going.  Believe me, I know things are tight, but liberty has a cost.  I have made the commitment to chase the socialists, their un-Constitutional agenda, and bring you information on midterm electoral candidates.  I need my subscribers to step up and commit to $20 a month.  That’s .66 cents a day for a laser focus on the District of Criminals and the 2010 elections.  I could then stop burning research time pounding the pavement searching for jobs that don’t exist.  For you newbies just arriving, hit the pages at the top of the blog and you will see what the Monster has been about since Day One.

I have committed to educating as many as possible, but it’s crunch time for me folks.  It’s time to truly consider donating to the Monster with a monthly subscription to keep the research and news coming.  The Monster receives thousands of unique visits each day including, but not limited to, The Fed, The Senate, The House, GS, Davis, Polk & Wardwell, Perkins Coie, Raytheon, NASA…need I go on?  I am working on finding sponsors that represent our values and won’t compromise my ability to produce an independent viewpoint, but I need help getting over this hurdle.

The Monster has made the commitment for the long haul, will you?  Make the choice, hit the button, do it once.  Thank you.

Comment left by Granny Gripes:

and on behalf of Tiger’s efforts, I put out the call for everyone to dig deep and send 20 bucks and or find someone supporting a valuable candidate to dig out 10 people to send 20 bucks to Tiger to launch this venture; give up a bottle of wine or happy hour or a steak just one day and pass it on to her somewhere she has a donate click.





“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato

Want To Keep Playing Obama’s Game?

Want To Keep Playing Obama’s Game?

This qualifies as a Daily Crime.  We must do everything legally possible to stop the Obama Redistributive Nightmare.  I think it is time for those Americans that still have accounts at the big banks to think about moving your money to a community bank.   Send a message to the biggest banks that we did not like them almost collapsing our economy, and a message to this administration that their continued redistribution of wealth by forcing us to pay higher fees so that those risky banks can pay us back is ludicrous, and criminal.

Obama Unveils Proposal on Bank Taxes

The president, who said his resolve in recouping taxpayer funds has been stiffened by reports of “obscene bonuses,” formally unveiled his plan for a new tax on large financial firms. The tax, which the White House calls a “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee,” is expected to raise $117 billion over about 12 years, and $90 billion over the next 10 years. Around 60% of the revenue will come from the 10 largest financial firms.

If approved by lawmakers, the fee would go into effect June 30 and last at least 10 years. It would amount to 0.15% of total assets minus high-quality capital, such as common stock, and disclosed and retained earnings. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.-covered deposits and insurance-policy reserves would be untaxed because such assets are already subject to federal fees, according to the White House. The tax would hit around 50 banks, insurance companies and large broker-dealers. Of those, about 35 would be U.S. companies and 10 to 15 would be U.S. subsidiaries of foreign financial firms.

How can Obama b*tch and complain about bonuses when he rewarded failure?  What does he expect?  TARP has given his administration a populist bully pulpit to hammer away at his redistributive change methodology.

Is it at all possible that you, as an American consumer with the power of the purse strings, might not want to play Bambi’s game anymore?  Just look at Ford who is rising from the ashes, and received no government handouts.

“What’s The Problem With Sarah Palin?”

Liberals continue to have serious problems with people that speak the truth in a down to earth manner minus the political correctness.  Let’s all watch liberals’ heads pop countrywide.

Once Again, How Stupid Is This?

Barney Frank Not Convinced Compensation Linked To Talent; Limit Bonuses

Meanwhile, the Obama administration is moving to impose a new fee on banks to make up the deficit in the government’s $700 billion bailout program for the industry.

WHAT? How stupid is that? I swear the morons in Washington do not understand the finite concept. There is only so much money in the world (unless you are the Fed) and it is constantly in motion. When Obama fines the banks to recoup the money he took from us to bail them out, the banks charge us higher fees to pay us back for the money we loaned them. WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT? Is there an understanding NOW why so many were against the bailouts back in September, 2008?

Bad Behavior has blocked 1610 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: