The Next Piece In The Fascist Puzzle; Gun Control

Let’s recap some of the unconstitutional and un-American activities¬† of this current administration, and please remember the definition of fascism; socialism with a veneer of capitalism.

  • Consummate community organizer with 143 days of senate experience is installed in the White House.
  • The Federal Government obtains control of the banks.
  • The Federal Government obtains control of 2 major car companies.
  • The White House plunges the country into unprecedented red ink.
  • The pResident appoints 30some apparently crazy czars with no congressional oversight.
  • The liberal left congress confirms an activist supreme court justice.
  • The Federal Reserve prints money day and night, and monetizes the debt.
  • The Federal Reserve “loses” $9 Trillion taxpayer dollars.
  • The T.A.R.P. is NOT transparent.
  • The White House to set standards for compensation across the financial industry.
  • The White House and Congress have liberal left groups writing the bills.
  • The White House and Congress ARE NOT READING the bills before voting on them.
  • The pResident and his far left liberal cronies try to obtain control of 1/6 of our economy through healthcare reform and a government run plan.
  • The senate writes a bill where an American will ultimately go to jail for not signing up for health care and paying the fines associated with it.

….and the next piece of the puzzle is the piece that readers here at the Monster have been waiting for because we knew it was coming; control of 2nd Amendment rights.

From the Washington Post:

High Court to Examine Local Handgun Laws

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will decide whether the right to own guns for self-defense, announced by the court last year when it struck down the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns, also covers states and other cities with gun-control laws.

The landmark decision in Heller v. District of Columbia did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond the federal government and federal enclaves like the District.

The case the court accepted Wednesday concerns the city of Chicago, which bans most handguns.

In the Heller case, the court held for the first time that individuals have a right to gun ownership. Until then, the court had only recognized that the constitutional “right to keep and bear arms” protected a state’s ability to maintain a militia.

Other court precedents have held that the Second Amendment restricts only federal law, as was the case with most of the Bill of Rights. Through the years, the court has applied most of the amendments, but not all, to the states, a process called “incorporation.” The Heller decision specifically left the question about the Second Amendment for another day.

Alan Gura, the Alexandria lawyer who successfully challenged the District’s law, sued the city of Chicago, which has a handgun ban virtually identical to Washington’s, plus other restrictions. Ruling in that case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit said only the Supreme Court can decide whether the Second Amendment applies.

“Even if the Court were to hold the Second Amendment applicable to states and localities,” he said, “such a ruling is unlikely to change the crucial holding by the Supreme Court in Heller that a wide range of reasonable gun laws are presumptively constitutional, and that the Second Amendment right is narrowly limited to guns in the home for self-defense.”

The door is about to be opened to the loss of more states and individuals’ rights.

By Logistics Monster


  • In addition to the above, let’s not forget the campaign to seek ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)and how it applies to American private gun ownership. There is a UNICEF (DON”T SUPPORT THIS GROUP) brochure currently out entitled No Guns, Please: We Are Children. Among the many damaging statements to 2nd amendment rights in this booklet is this, “In societies destabilized by the use of small arms and light weapons, children are denied many of their rights, including their rights to freedom from violence and exploitation, survival and development, health care, education and care within a family environment. As a result, hard-won developmental gains are often lost and may even be reversed.”

    Any country who embraces this freedom damaging document will have entered into a binding legal agreement to regulate its citizens in all manners consistent with the UN’s ideals on child human rights.

    Another UN document entitled Guide to the Implementation of the World Programme of Action for Youth, declares as a necessary part of child rights, “Explore enacting bans on all handguns to civilians or certain cheap models that are attractive to youth”. What in the world does that imply?

    Any of our laws, even those permitting such uses of arms, including state hunting laws, must give way to treaties.

    Also, the UN article 29 of the CRC provides for “peace education” or in other words, disarmament education states: “…understood as any form of action aimed at limiting, controlling or reducing arms, including unilateral disarmament initiatives, and, ultimately, general and complete disarmament under effective international control. It may also be understood as a process aimed at transforming the current system of armed nation States into a new world order of planned unarmed peace in which war is no longer an instrument of national policy and peoples determine their own future and live in security based on justice and solidarity.” If this isn’t the ultimate surrender to Utopian rule. Keep an eye on this treaty. It surface every couple of years in congress and will be back soon. Can you imagine Bo’s concept of this treaty is? No doubt it is part of his overall plan. Some in congress/senate are really pushing for this treaty.

    All of thee documents can be found online. And, please, when they come trick-or-treating for UNICEF, don’t feel sorry for the munchkins. “Oh, but they do so much other good, blah, blah, blah.” DO NOT GIVE!

  • Suzy, it seems the link you provided is no longer found, must of hit a nerve. Fortunately most kids just want candy and are not willing to trick or treat for UNICEF.

    Halloween is on a Saturday this year so there will be more than usual I will make a note of any trick of treating for UNICEF and they will get the Good and Plenty.

  • Well, here in the land of “Fruits&nuts” (Californication)there are 2 bills on the “Govenator’s” desk dealing with yet MORE gun control laws. One makes it unlawfull to “sell or trade” weapons at gun shows at the Cow palace in San Fransicko. The other would make it illeagal to “trade, transfer, or give away more than 50 rounds of ammo per month, even to family members, AND you would have to go through a back ground check, be finger printed, pay a yearly fee, and have a government I D card just to purchase Ammo, and even then you could only purchase 50 rounds per month. Gee, I wonder where those of us that live on bordering states such as Oregon, Nevada, & Arizona are going to buy our ammo? You have to ask yourself: “Is this not an infringement on the 2nd Amendment?”

Comments are closed.

Related Posts

Bad Behavior has blocked 2028 access attempts in the last 7 days.

No widgets found. Go to Widget page and add the widget in Offcanvas Sidebar Widget Area.