Today’s AYFKM? Award Is A Toss Up Between…

…non-rep Grayson (D-FL) for stating that the republican health care plan is for you to die quickly if you get sick.

Non-rep. Grayson’s comment could be considered a lie, except he probably has not read H.R. 3438 introduced by Darrell Issa, R-CA which allows Americans access to the federal employees’ health care package. Hit the link, read it, and then email it to dipstick Grayson.  You may want to email it to your friends and family also.

The second Today’s AYFKM? Award goes to Science Czar John Holdren for espousing a strong enough belief that he put it into a college textbook he co-authored stating that the government should seize babies born to unwed mothers and put them up for adoption (among other brilliant ideas).

Holdren: Seize babies born to unwed women

Proposed government force adoption if mother refused to get abortion

Obama science czar John Holdren stated in a college textbook

that “illegitimate children” born to unwed mothers could be taken by the government and put up for adoption if the mother refused to have an abortion.

Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, argued that “illegitimate childbearing could be strongly discouraged” as a socioeconomic measure imposed to control population growth.

As previously reported, WND has obtained a copy of the 1970s college textbook “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” that Ehrlich co-authored with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich’s wife, Anne. The authors argued involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by “climate change.”

On page 786, the authors wrote that one way to discourage illegitimate childbearing “might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption – especially those born to minors who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone.”

Alternatively, the authors suggested unwed mothers might place their babies up for adoption, writing: “If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it.”

While observing that government-imposed coercive measures should be considered “only if milder measures fail completely,” the authors acknowledged extreme ecological situations could justify governmental intervention with coercive population control measures,

“It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society,” they write.

“Some people – respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included – have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right,” the authors continued on page 838. “Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce.”

In a similar fashion, the authors argued that a right to privacy did not extend to an unlimited right to have children, elaborating on page 838 that, “Where the society has a ‘compelling, subordinating interest’ in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society’s survival depended on having more children, women could be required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted.”

Go over and read the rest and if you are not already saying Are You Freakin’ Kidding Me? you will be.  Un-frakkin-believable!  I wouldn’t want this guy anywhere near my dirty laundry, let alone DC or the White House.

Can we impeach Obama yet?

(P.S. Glenn Beck now has 5 refounders)

6 thoughts on “Today’s AYFKM? Award Is A Toss Up Between…”

  1. Pingback: Diamond Tiger
  2. I think JB Williams may be right. He wrote an article yesterday in Canada Free Press saying that all the left wing radicals and BO supporters are mentally ill with serious mental problems. And he was serious. We do need to get the fraud-in-chief and all of his fellow thugs out of there very, very soon. I know, maybe they can all go to Copenhagen

  3. I forgot to watch the video clip before I commented above.
    What kind of freakin idiots do we put in congress? Any preschooler could do a better presentation than that. That is beyond disgusting. I would be embarrassed at myself if I were him. And is he defending HR3200 which is the freakin DEATH PANEL?

  4. I know I am preaching to the choir with this one and I am sorry for its length. I came across this yesterday and is credited to Dog Poet, I have no idea who that is. It just pulled a lot together for me and made me realize that some people are just going to be lost causes, not matter how much truth you show them.

    “It seems to me that you have to be honest to see the truth, If you are not honest then your perspective is skewered by your dishonesty and denial. This is why they can not tell the truth and why a certain portion of the public can not believe the truth. Every day the magnitude of lies and the dreadful behavior of a few are being seen more widely and more deeply into.”

    Sadly many of these people referred to are in the Government and the fringe media.

  5. Seeing as how the democratic plan is:

    1) Let us make you sick with mandatory vaccines.
    2) Die slowly with boatloads of expensive prescription drugs to make you suffer even more and leave your family destitute.

    Grayson doesn’t have much talking room. But then again, with a guy like Holdren in “charge” of science, we have a new option:

    3) Let us kill you before you become a burden on The Party.

  6. Grail, there is no way I will have that vaccine for H141. IMO it is just a way for the government to use the populace as a bunch of guinea pigs. Either that or a chance for them to innoculate us all with their new form of kool-aid. This vaccine has not been researched or tested enough for mass use on the American people. We’ve been down this road with swine flu vacccines before: the result being many deaths of the poor souls who were innoculated. Remember Gerry Ford’s brave (some think pretend) public innoculation? It would take a lot more than that for me to be convinced that it was safe.

Comments are closed.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1128 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: