Is it possible that the war in Libya to remove Qaddafi is really all about keeping a gold-backed Libyan dinar off the world stage and thus avoiding a complete collapse of the American dollar, the US economy, and other globalist currencies when oil will suddenly be traded in gold backed dinars versus the dollar?
Do you think it is more probable (Occam’s Razor) that the international bankers targeted Qaddafi for taking advantage of the global economic collapse and attempting to give the African continent a chance at economic equality and prosperity, OR that the American public is spending it’s hard earned cash on a humanitarian mission? (Given our government’s prediliction for ‘national security’ pre-emptions.)
Qaddafi, in two World Mathaba conferences held in 1996 and 2000, was attempting such a move besides speaking about pulling out of the World Bank and the IMF and establishing an African continent bank that would provide loans between member countries.
Using NATO provides plausible deniability, establishes UN governing precedents over US citizens and their cash, and cloaks the international bankers’ real position and purpose.
Shall we throw another log on the fire:
In 2000, Saddam Hussein announced Iraqi oil would be traded in euros, not dollars. Some say sanctions and an invasion followed because the Americans were desperate to prevent OPEC from transferring oil trading in all its member countries to the euro.
According to former Treasury Secretary, Paul O’Neil, George Bush (43) started planning to take out Saddam Hussein ten days after his inauguration; a full ten months before 9.11 occurred.
2004 60 Minutes Interview With Paul O’Neil and Ronald Suskind, author of “The Price Of Loyalty”:
Are you feeling any better about 9.11 Truthers now?
MARCH 28, 2011:
And almost everyone now knows that where a central bank goes, debt and poverty follow…