Look For The Coverup And See The Lie: Eliminating The Natural Born Clause

Jul 2, 2011 by

Look For The Coverup And See The Lie: Eliminating The Natural Born Clause

Follow the cover-up and find the lie.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. - Article II, Section 1, Clause 5

It was obvious to many Americans that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro could NOT be constitutionally eligible to even RUN for president well before Hillary stepped aside during the 2008 Democratic convention.  For Hillary supporters the end of their affiliation with the democratic party happened on May 31st, 2008 when the corruption of the party was in full view as Clinton delegates were given to Obama in states where he wasn’t even on the ballot.  It was obvious then that the powers that be had decided who was going to be the nominee and it did not matter who the people had voted for.  That is when the digging on Barry really started and the fake COLB was produced.  TPTB tried to deflect the attention to Obama/Soetoro being born in Hawaii but the true issue was his ineligibility because of his british citizenship at birth from his father’s side and his indonesian citizenship from his step-father.

I am now very happy to post a video showing the complicity of the entire legislative branch and most of the judicial branch when it comes to ‘propping up’ an un-Constitutional british/indonesian subject as our president.  Numerous legislative attempts to eliminate the natural born clause from the Constitution began in 2003 in order to allow Barry Soetoro to become a Constitutional president.  The bills that were introduced follow the video.

Now you know why the entire Congress is sticking together on the eligibility issue; hang together or hang separately.

 

Note that each attempt to redefine or eliminate the natural born clause goes to the elimination of the requirement that the president is born to two legitimate American citizens.

June 11, 2003: Vic Snyder (D) introduces H.J. Res. 59 (108th Congress)

September 3, 2003: John Conyers (D) introduces H.J. Res. 67

February 25, 2004: Don Nickles (R) introduces Senate Bill 2128

September 15, 2004: Dana Rohrabacher (D) introduces H.J. Res. 104

January 4, 2005: John Conyers (D) introduces H.J. Res. 2

February 1, 2005: Dana Rohrabacher (D) introduces H.J. Res 15

April 14, 2005: Vic Snyder (D) introduces H.J. Res. 42

February 28, 2008: Claire McCaskill tries to attach an alteration to a military bill (S. 2678) Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama co-sponsors.

April 10, 2008: Claire McCaskill introduces S. Res. 511 which was passed by the Senate on April 30, 2008. Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama co-sponsors.

S. Res. 511:

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

8 Comments

  1. Mahalo, Tiger! I’ll use this in my Hump Day Report. One of the things that’s happened to me since 2008′s election is that I don’t believe in coincidences anymore. This video explains the deception perfectly….also keep in mind that the media (except for the National Enquirer) refused to follow-up/report on the growing story about John Edwards’ infidelity and child. If they had, Hillary would have won the states that Edwards got and she would have been the nominee. Coincidence? No way!!!

    • There have not been any coincidences for over 120 years. The fingerprint of government/elite involvement is the two-fer. Whatever situation is occurring always benefits them in more than one way.

  2. There is no one to go to , somehow we have wound up with no one on our side, no Judicial watch or whistle blowers or House on UnAmerican activitites, if we could get him out on this ineligiblity clause all of the horrendous things he has signed into law would be null and void. It always amazes me when politicians and newspeople discuss who would be able ot beat Obama in 2012, he is not eligible to run for Goodness sakes, they just keep up the charade.

  3. Maybe if people got together and started class action suits we could do soemthing, better yeat get a few million people together and have a citizens arrest, am I getting too desperate? just trying ot figure out a way to do what the Government should have done three years ago. It must bne so empowering for the elite ot do all the things they have done and we just sit here, maybe we could get a group into office, the Judicial watch is a group that is always in there trying, maybe we could put them in. Daryl Issa is a liar, he was going to take the bull by the horns and clean up the Whitehouse , instead he claims he is only there to make Obama look good , that is not what he said he was going to do, he has done nothing. Is it possible that everyone in this world can be bought and paid for? The only delight I get out of life anymore is telling Issa and Boehner to blow it out their ear on twitter.

  4. Tom Driscoll So. Maine

    From a post by: AmericansRon2U

    Maybe you folks in DC ought to look up the definition of HIGH TREASON! Barry doesn’t need to be impeached…it will never pass the Senate due to the CommieCrat majority. He is guilty of TREASON…’we the people’ know it, why don’t the politicians…why is the GOP silently allowing the destruction of our Constitution, our Bill of Rights and our country??? According to the Declaration of Independence (if any idiots in DC would take the time to READ it…of course, they don’t even read the BILLS) it states quite emphatically: “That whenever any form of govt. becomes destructive of these ends, it is the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new govt., laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect safety and happiness.”
    We don’t need the APPROVAL of Congress to abolish the Obama Regime….’we the people’ have the RIGHT, the DUTY to do it all by ourselves! Can you hear me now, DC???

  5. Actiually , according to the Constitution we have a right to unseat tyhe Supreme court if people feel they are not doing their job, they are not doing their job. We also have the right ot impeach the WQhole Government and start all over agasin, that is also in the constitution, I don’t know how you would og about it since we have no citizens aid programs in Government, no Judicial watch and no ethics committee, oh we do hav ean athics sommittee but they ar not for us, Darrell Issa informed us after much chest thumpiong what he was going ot do aobut Obama b ut when he got into office he did nothing nd said he was just there to make Obama look good, someday he will regret that, when Obama goes his buddy Issa can go with him. W eneed a complete Overhaul , we need ot clean house. The Tea Party should concentrate on the real problem, getting Obama out, what good is less spending when your country si disappearing, no disrespect to the TP but we will be saving Gov. money while we are living in the streets.

  6. JUDY J

    AMERICA CAN NOT TAKE ANOTHER YEAR OF OBAMA OR THE PEOPLE HE HAS IN THERE WITH HIM.I BELIEVE HE WAS PLACED IN OFFICE TO BRING AMERICA TO HER KNEES,AND HE IS DOING IT. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE GOT TO GET THEM ALL OUT OR WE WILL BE PAYING A HEAVY PRICE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 101,632 bad guys.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2863 access attempts in the last 7 days.