Health Canada Raids Homes At Gunpoint Over Nutritional Supplements

Jul 10, 2010 by

Heads-up people!  This is what is coming down the line for America.

If you do not understand what the United Nations, World Health Organization, Codex Alimentarius, Monsanto with their genetically modified foods, World Trade Organization and Big Pharma are currently doing, start with this video and then visit the The Codex tab at the top of the page. (Hint: Nutrients are toxins.)  Ever wonder where the plethora of ‘diseases’ that require pharmaceutical commercials all day and night came from? I do.

After watching this video about Health Canada’s raids on private homes and businesses, think long and hard about Obamacare and how much easier it will be for them to dramatically change your lifespan vs. just drugging you for your entire life (and making a profit all the while).

A QUESTION OF SOVEREIGNTY discusses why this dramatic shift in the balance of power puts the nation and its people at a vital crossroad early in the 21st century — and why some of the past giants of Canadian politics may hold the answers to Canada’s future.

Quietly, over a period of many years, unconstitutional legislation encompassed in Bills C-51, C-6, and the current Bill C-36 have placed not only basic civil liberties and freedoms at risk, but Canada’s national sovereignty as well. The film shares how entangling alliances with groups like the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, Codex Alimentarius, the United States and even multinational corporate interests have become so powerful that they literally threaten to make elected officials in Parliament irrelevant.

A QUESTION OF SOVEREIGNTY – a film by Kevin P. Miller from Kevin P. Miller on Vimeo.

THANKS BILL!

Presidency of Bill Clinton:

Trade

President Clinton signs NAFTA.

Clinton made it one of his goals as president to pass trade legislation that lowered the barriers to trade with other nations. He broke with many of his supporters, including labor unions, and those in his own party to support free-trade legislation.[48] Opponents argued that lowering tariffs and relaxing rules on imports would cost American jobs because people would buy cheaper products from other countries. Clinton countered that free trade would help America because it would allow the U.S. to boost its exports and grow the economy. Clinton also believed that free trade could help move foreign nations to economic and political reform.

The three-nation NAFTA was signed by Present George H. W. Bush during December 1992, pending its ratification by the legislatures of the three countries. Clinton did not alter the original agreement, but complemented it with the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation and the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation, making NAFTA the first “green” trade treaty and the first trade treaty concerned with each countries labor law, albeit with very weak sanctions.[49] NAFTA provided for gradually reduced tariffs and the creation of a free-trading bloc of North American countries–the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Opponents of NAFTA, led by Ross Perot, claimed it would force American companies to move their workforces to Mexico, where they could produce goods with cheaper labor and ship them back to the United States at lower prices. Clinton, however, argued that NAFTA would increase U.S. exports and create new jobs. He convinced many Democrats to join most Republicans in supporting trade agreement and in 1993 the Congress passed the treaty.[50]

Clinton also held meetings with leaders of Pacific Rim nations to discuss lowering trade barriers. In November 1993 he hosted a meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) in Seattle, Washington, which was attended by the leaders of 12 Pacific Rim nations. In 1994, Clinton arranged an agreement in Indonesia with Pacific Rim nations to gradually remove trade barriers and open their markets.

Officials in the Clinton administration also participated in the final round of trade negotiations sponsored by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), an international trade organization. The negotiations had been ongoing since 1986. In a rare move, Clinton convened Congress to ratify the trade agreement in the winter of 1994, during which the treaty was approved. As part of the GATT agreement, a new international trade body, the World Trade Organization (WTO), replaced GATT in 1995. The new WTO had stronger authority to enforce trade agreements and covered a wider range of trade than did GATT.

Clinton faced his first defeat on trade legislation during his second term. In November 1997, the Republican-controlled Congress delayed voting on a bill to restore a presidential trade authority that had expired in 1994. The bill would have given the president the authority to negotiate trade agreements which the Congress was not authorized to modify–known as “fast-track negotiating” because it streamlines the treaty process. Clinton was unable to generate sufficient support for the legislation, even among the Democratic Party.

Clinton faced yet another trade setback in December 1999, when the WTO met in Seattle for a new round of trade negotiations. Clinton hoped that new agreements on issues such as agriculture and intellectual property could be proposed at the meeting, but the talks fell through. Anti-WTO protesters in the streets of Seattle disrupted the meetings[51] and the international delegates attending the meetings were unable to compromise mainly because delegates from smaller, poorer countries resisted Clinton’s efforts to discuss labor and environmental standards.[52]

That same year, Clinton signed a landmark trade agreement with the People’s Republic of China. The agreement–the result of more than a decade of negotiations–would lower many trade barriers between the two countries, making it easier to export U.S. products such as automobiles, banking services, and motion pictures. However, the agreement could only take effect if China was accepted into the WTO and was granted permanent “normal trade relations” status by the U.S. Congress. Under the pact, the United States would support China’s membership in the WTO. Many Democrats as well as Republicans were reluctant to grant permanent status to China because they were concerned about human rights in the country and the impact of Chinese imports on U.S. industries and jobs. Congress, however, voted in 2000 to grant permanent normal trade relations with China. Several economic studies have since been released that indicate the increase in trade resulting lowered American prices and increased the U.S. GDP by 0.7 percent throughout the following decade.[53]

The Clinton administration negotiated a total of about 300 trade agreements with other countries.[54] Clinton’s last treasury secretary, Lawrence Summers, stated that the lowered tariffs that resulted from Clinton’s trade policies, which reduced prices to consumers and kept inflation low, were technically “the largest tax cut in the history of the world.”[55]

Larry forgot to tell you that between the trade agreements and the Community Reinvestment Act, they were going to collapse America as we knew it.

Anybody still want to be registered as anything other than an Independent?

5 Comments

  1. California Patriot

    I’m confused. Are there five comments to this post? Where are they?

  2. California Patriot

    I see a video of a Karl Rove interview here. Is everyone aware that Karl Rove is a hell of an evil dude?

  3. red lemur

    f@#k the…….codex,wto,nwo,nafta,the un and the small arms treaty
    come take my vitamins,and guns!I’m waiting?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Diamond Tiger - Latest at Logistics Monster: Health Canada Raids Homes At Gunpoint Over Nutritional Supplements http://is.gd/dmDfq
  2. Diamond Tiger - Health Canada Raids Homes At Gunpoint Over Nutritional Supplements via Logistics Monster - Heads-up ... http://tinyurl.com/2cxrgs7
  3. The Source - CanadaRights.com Health Canada Raids Homes At Gunpoint Over Nutritional Supplements ...: As part of the GATT agree... http://bit.ly/9jG6wA
  4. Ann-Marie - http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/07/10/health-canada-raids-homes-at-gunpoint-over-nutritional-supplements/
  5. Ann-Marie - RT @LogisticMonster: Health Canada Raids Homes At Gunpoint Over Nutritional Supplements #C-36 #C-51 #C-6 #Codex http://bit.ly/cY9Leu
  6. Guy Adim - mustread Health Canada Raids Homes At Gunpoint Over Nutritional Supplements ...: According to the Federal Reserve'... http://bit.ly/d0MAmr

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 128,159 bad guys.

Bad Behavior has blocked 19356 access attempts in the last 7 days.