Comments on: Bernanke Confirmation Hearings (UPDATE: Confirmed 70-30 With Voting Record) http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/ Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:47:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 1sgboom http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/comment-page-1/#comment-39603 1sgboom Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:44:29 +0000 http://logisticsmonster.com/?p=13127#comment-39603 Well well....my....oops, California's rep Babs Boxer voted nay...Could it be that she REALLY is worried about her upcoming re-election? Well Babs...no need to worry you'll get your unemployment check next November. And to ALL those gutless Repubs that vote yes...Well STAND BY YOU IDIOTS! YOUR unemployment checks are waiting for you too! Well well….my….oops, California’s rep Babs Boxer voted nay…Could it be that she REALLY is worried about her upcoming re-election? Well Babs…no need to worry you’ll get your unemployment check next November. And to ALL those gutless Repubs that vote yes…Well STAND BY YOU IDIOTS! YOUR unemployment checks are waiting for you too!

]]> By: LogisticsMonster http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/comment-page-1/#comment-39549 LogisticsMonster Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:11:50 +0000 http://logisticsmonster.com/?p=13127#comment-39549 Ken - I read on twitter today (and am looking for print confirmation) that Bob Bennett voted for Bernanke because he didn't want to open the door to another liberal Obama pick. Yes, it would have been worse - can you say Larry Summers? Here is your jumping off point - this guy is really bad: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers Ken – I read on twitter today (and am looking for print confirmation) that Bob Bennett voted for Bernanke because he didn’t want to open the door to another liberal Obama pick. Yes, it would have been worse – can you say Larry Summers?

Here is your jumping off point – this guy is really bad:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers

]]> By: Ken in IL http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/comment-page-1/#comment-39547 Ken in IL Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:59:37 +0000 http://logisticsmonster.com/?p=13127#comment-39547 22 of 40 Republicans voted to confirm !!! Was the alternative going to be that bad ??? No party unity here!! Somebody please explain ... 22 of 40 Republicans voted to confirm !!!

Was the alternative going to be that bad ???

No party unity here!! Somebody please explain …

]]> By: Scott Groves http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/comment-page-1/#comment-51838 Scott Groves Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:46:33 +0000 http://logisticsmonster.com/?p=13127#comment-51838 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @LogisticMonster: Senate Vote Record for Bernanke Confirmation: http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/</span></span> RT @LogisticMonster: Senate Vote Record for Bernanke Confirmation: http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/

]]> By: Diamond Tiger http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/comment-page-1/#comment-51839 Diamond Tiger Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:55:43 +0000 http://logisticsmonster.com/?p=13127#comment-51839 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Senate Vote Record for Bernanke Confirmation: http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/</span></span> Senate Vote Record for Bernanke Confirmation: http://logisticsmonster.com/2010/01/28/bernanke-confirmation-hearings/

]]>