Uncategorized

Don’t Like The Outcome? Change The Rules

via Michelle Malkin

Are you getting tired enough yet of the Democrats always changing the rules to suit their agenda and desired outcomes? What about all the changes in the Massachusetts special election laws so that Paul Kirk could be seated to replace Dead Kennedy?

Remember this?

What Ted Kennedy Wants

Senator Ted Kennedy, who is gravely ill with brain cancer, has sent a letter to Massachusetts lawmakers requesting a change in the state law that determines how his Senate seat would be filled if it became vacant before his eighth full term ends in 2012. Current law mandates that a special election be held at least 145 days after the seat becomes available. Mr. Kennedy is concerned that such a delay could leave his fellow Democrats in the Senate one vote short of a filibuster-proof majority for months while a special election takes place.

“I therefore am writing to urge you to work together to amend the law through the normal legislative process to provide for a temporary gubernatorial appointment until the special election occurs,” writes the Senator.

What Mr. Kennedy doesn’t volunteer is that he orchestrated the 2004 succession law revision that now requires a special election, and for similarly partisan reasons. John Kerry, the other Senator from the state, was running for President in 2004, and Mr. Kennedy wanted the law changed so the Republican Governor at the time, Mitt Romney, could not name Mr. Kerry’s replacement. “Prodded by a personal appeal from Senator Edward M. Kennedy,” reported the Boston Globe in 2004, “Democratic legislative leaders have agreed to take up a stalled bill creating a special election process to replace U.S. Senator John F. Kerry if he wins the presidency.” Now that the state has a Democratic Governor, Mr. Kennedy wants to revert to gubernatorial appointments.

Now that the Dems no longer have the supermajority in the Senate, Barney Frank floated the idea that the filibuster wasn’t created by God, and accordingly, the dems want to change rules again to fix their problem.

Whiners, losers…etc…
Filibuster reform bill headed for Senate floor, faces uphill battle

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) intends to introduce legislation that would take away the minority’s power to filibuster legislation.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) intends in the next few weeks to introduce legislation that would take away the minority’s power to filibuster legislation.

Harkin has wanted to change the filibuster for years, but his move would come in the wake of Republican Scott Brown’s dramatic victory in Massachusetts. Brown’s victory cost Democrats their 60th vote in the Senate, and may have dealt a death blow to their hopes to move a massive healthcare overhaul. It could also limit President Barack Obama’s ability to move other pieces of his agenda forward.

Harkin believes senators in recent years have abused the procedural move.

Harkin’s bill would still allow senators to delay legislation, but ultimately would give the majority the power to move past a filibuster with a simple majority vote.

His staff said the bill would be introduced sometime before the Senate’s current work period ends on Feb. 13.

Iowa? Do you realize what is happening to the checks and balances in our government, and are you going to dump this asshat first chance?

4 thoughts on “Don’t Like The Outcome? Change The Rules

  1. Pingback: Palin Twibe
  2. And how long do we think it’s going to be before there’s a bill introduced that bypasses those messy, expensive elections? Why not just allow Congress to appoint their own membership? Why trouble us helpless little people with the burden of choosing our representatives?

    Enough!

  3. Pingback: Palin Twibe

Comments are closed.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1007 access attempts in the last 7 days.